%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET780-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.58s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_12ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_28ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| member(k(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| difference(X1,X2,X3) ),
difference_axiom2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| difference(X1,X2,X3)
| member(k(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
c_0_12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( member(k(X1,X2,X1),X1)
| difference(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| difference(X1,X2,X3)
| member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
c_0_15,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
( member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
subsets_axiom1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( member(k(X1,X2,X1),X2)
| difference(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( member(k(X1,X1,X2),X2)
| difference(X1,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ difference(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,X3)
| member(X1,X4) ),
c_0_19,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ difference(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
c_0_20,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ member(X4,X3)
| ~ difference(X1,X2,X3)
| member(X4,X1) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| equal_sets(X2,X1) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ subset(X2,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,X3) ),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ equal_sets(X1,X2)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ equal_sets(X1,X2)
| subset(X2,X1) ),
c_0_25,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SET780-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:38:18 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2111503 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.58 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.23/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.58 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2111504 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.58 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 % No proof found!
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.23/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.23/0.58 % Processed clauses : 21
% 0.23/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.23/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.23/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.23/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.23/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/0.58 % Paramodulations : 13
% 0.23/0.58 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.23/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.23/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.23/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 50
% 0.23/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.23/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.23/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.23/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 609
% 0.23/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 37
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.58 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.58 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.58 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.58 % User time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/0.58 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.58 % Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.23/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------