↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET789+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.87s 1.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   78 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (  28   ~;  23   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   1 sgn  20   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(order,axiom,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( order(R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X,Y,Z] :
            ( ( member(Z,E)
              & member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( ( apply(R,Y,Z)
                & apply(R,X,Y) )
             => apply(R,X,Z) ) )
        & ! [X,Y] :
            ( ( member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( ( apply(R,Y,X)
                & apply(R,X,Y) )
             => X = Y ) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( member(X,E)
           => apply(R,X,X) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(greatest,axiom,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( greatest(M,R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( member(X,E)
           => apply(R,X,M) )
        & member(M,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',greatest) ).

fof(thIV1,conjecture,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( ( greatest(M,R,E)
        & order(R,E) )
     => ! [X] :
          ( greatest(X,R,E)
         => M = X ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thIV1) ).

fof(thIV1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [R,E,M] :
        ( ( greatest(M,R,E)
          & order(R,E) )
       => ! [X] :
            ( greatest(X,R,E)
           => M = X ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV1]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( D = C
    | ~ apply(A,D,C)
    | ~ apply(A,C,D)
    | ~ member(D,B)
    | ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ order(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_11,plain,
    ? [R,E,M] :
      ( ? [X] :
          ( M != X
          & greatest(X,R,E) )
      & greatest(M,R,E)
      & order(R,E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thIV1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thIV1_neg,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK3
    & greatest(sK3,sK0,sK1)
    & greatest(sK2,sK0,sK1)
    & order(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(R,sK0),skolemize(E,sK1),skolemize(M,sK2),skolemize(X,sK3)],[nnf_11]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    order(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_329,plain,
    ( apply(B,D,A)
    | ~ member(D,C)
    | ~ greatest(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[greatest]) ).

cnf(c_330,plain,
    ( member(A,C)
    | ~ greatest(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[greatest]) ).

cnf(c_332,negated_conjecture,
    greatest(sK2,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
    greatest(sK3,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_372,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK3,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_330]) ).

cnf(c_373,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,A,sK3)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_329]) ).

cnf(c_374,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_330]) ).

cnf(c_375,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,A,sK2)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_329]) ).

cnf(c_379,negated_conjecture,
    ( B = A
    | ~ apply(sK0,B,A)
    | ~ apply(sK0,A,B)
    | ~ member(B,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_561,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 != sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_562,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 != sK2,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_561]) ).

cnf(c_1031,plain,
    apply(sK0,sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_374,c_373]) ).

cnf(c_1041,plain,
    apply(sK0,sK3,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_375,c_372]) ).

cnf(c_2485,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK2 = sK3
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK3,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ member(sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1031,c_379]) ).

cnf(c_2486,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK3,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ member(sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2485]) ).

cnf(c_2487,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK3,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_372,c_2486]) ).

cnf(c_2488,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK3,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_374,c_2487]) ).

cnf(c_2489,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = sK2,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1041,c_2488]) ).

cnf(c_2484,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_562,c_2489]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET789+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:17:53 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.36  % Process 2418651 was started by sandbox2 on n003,
% 0.15/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:17:53 2026
% 0.15/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 3.87/1.05  
% 3.87/1.05  % given #500 (I,wt=53): 868 member(f1(A,B),B) | apply(A,f3(A,B),f2(A,B)) | member(f6(A,B),B) | -member(f3(A,B),B) | -member(C,B) | -member(f2(A,B),B) | -apply(A,f3(A,B),C) | -apply(A,C,f2(A,B)).  [factor(500,b,i)].
% 3.87/1.05  
% 3.87/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.87/1.05  
% 3.87/1.05  % Proof 1 at 0.60 (+ 0.05) seconds.
% 3.87/1.05  % Length of proof is 19.
% 3.87/1.05  % Level of proof is 4.
% 3.87/1.05  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 3.87/1.05  % Given clauses 658.
% 3.87/1.05  
% 3.87/1.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------