↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET790+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.51s 1.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  25   ~;  20   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   1 sgn  20   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(order,axiom,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( order(R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X,Y,Z] :
            ( ( member(Z,E)
              & member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( ( apply(R,Y,Z)
                & apply(R,X,Y) )
             => apply(R,X,Z) ) )
        & ! [X,Y] :
            ( ( member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( ( apply(R,Y,X)
                & apply(R,X,Y) )
             => X = Y ) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( member(X,E)
           => apply(R,X,X) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(least,axiom,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( least(M,R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( member(X,E)
           => apply(R,M,X) )
        & member(M,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',least) ).

fof(thIV2,conjecture,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( ( least(M,R,E)
        & order(R,E) )
     => ! [X] :
          ( least(X,R,E)
         => M = X ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thIV2) ).

fof(thIV2_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [R,E,M] :
        ( ( least(M,R,E)
          & order(R,E) )
       => ! [X] :
            ( least(X,R,E)
           => M = X ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV2]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( D = C
    | ~ apply(A,D,C)
    | ~ apply(A,C,D)
    | ~ member(D,B)
    | ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ order(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_11,plain,
    ? [R,E,M] :
      ( ? [X] :
          ( M != X
          & least(X,R,E) )
      & least(M,R,E)
      & order(R,E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thIV2_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thIV2_neg,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK3
    & least(sK3,sK0,sK1)
    & least(sK2,sK0,sK1)
    & order(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(R,sK0),skolemize(E,sK1),skolemize(M,sK2),skolemize(X,sK3)],[nnf_11]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    order(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_332,plain,
    ( apply(B,A,D)
    | ~ member(D,C)
    | ~ least(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[least]) ).

cnf(c_335,negated_conjecture,
    least(sK2,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_336,negated_conjecture,
    least(sK3,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_337,plain,
    ( member(A,C)
    | ~ least(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[least]) ).

cnf(c_375,negated_conjecture,
    ( B = A
    | ~ apply(sK0,B,A)
    | ~ apply(sK0,A,B)
    | ~ member(B,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_557,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 != sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_558,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 != sK2,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_557]) ).

cnf(c_808,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,sK2,A)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_335]) ).

cnf(c_809,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,sK3,A)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_336]) ).

cnf(c_810,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_335]) ).

cnf(c_811,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK3,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_336]) ).

cnf(c_1023,plain,
    apply(sK0,sK3,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_810,c_809]) ).

cnf(c_1650,plain,
    apply(sK0,sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_811,c_808]) ).

cnf(c_2482,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK3)
    | ~ member(sK3,sK1)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1023,c_375]) ).

cnf(c_2483,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK3)
    | ~ member(sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_810,c_2482]) ).

cnf(c_2484,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3 = sK2
    | ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_811,c_2483]) ).

cnf(c_2485,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = sK2,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1650,c_2484]) ).

cnf(c_2481,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_558,c_2485]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET790+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:17:03 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 1062462 was started by sandbox on n020,
% 0.09/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:17:03 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 6.51/1.24  
% 6.51/1.24  % given #500 (I,wt=53): 868 member(f1(A,B),B) | apply(A,f3(A,B),f2(A,B)) | member(f6(A,B),B) | -member(f3(A,B),B) | -member(C,B) | -member(f2(A,B),B) | -apply(A,f3(A,B),C) | -apply(A,C,f2(A,B)).  [factor(496,b,i)].
% 6.51/1.24  
% 6.51/1.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 6.51/1.24  
% 6.51/1.24  % Proof 1 at 0.75 (+ 0.04) seconds.
% 6.51/1.24  % Length of proof is 19.
% 6.51/1.24  % Level of proof is 4.
% 6.51/1.24  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 6.51/1.24  % Given clauses 655.
% 6.51/1.24  
% 6.51/1.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------