↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET794+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.53s 2.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  114 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  120 (  43   ~;  49   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   1 sgn  39   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(total_order,axiom,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( total_order(R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X,Y] :
            ( ( member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( apply(R,Y,X)
              | apply(R,X,Y) ) )
        & order(R,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',total_order) ).

fof(least,axiom,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( least(M,R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( member(X,E)
           => apply(R,M,X) )
        & member(M,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',least) ).

fof(min,axiom,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( min(M,R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( ( apply(R,X,M)
              & member(X,E) )
           => M = X )
        & member(M,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',min) ).

fof(thIV6,conjecture,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( ( min(M,R,E)
        & total_order(R,E) )
     => least(M,R,E) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thIV6) ).

fof(thIV6_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [R,E,M] :
        ( ( min(M,R,E)
          & total_order(R,E) )
       => least(M,R,E) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV6]) ).

fof(nnf_11,plain,
    ? [R,E,M] :
      ( ~ least(M,R,E)
      & min(M,R,E)
      & total_order(R,E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thIV6_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thIV6_neg,plain,
    ( ~ least(sK2,sK0,sK1)
    & min(sK2,sK0,sK1)
    & total_order(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(R,sK0),skolemize(E,sK1),skolemize(M,sK2)],[nnf_11]) ).

cnf(c_322,negated_conjecture,
    total_order(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV6_neg]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ( apply(A,D,C)
    | apply(A,C,D)
    | ~ member(D,B)
    | ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ total_order(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[total_order]) ).

cnf(c_334,plain,
    ( A = D
    | ~ apply(B,D,A)
    | ~ member(D,C)
    | ~ min(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[min]) ).

cnf(c_335,plain,
    ( member(A,C)
    | ~ min(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[min]) ).

cnf(c_338,negated_conjecture,
    min(sK2,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV6_neg]) ).

cnf(c_361,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_335]) ).

cnf(c_362,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK2 = A
    | ~ apply(sK0,A,sK2)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_334]) ).

cnf(c_549,negated_conjecture,
    ~ least(sK2,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV6_neg]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ apply(R,M,X)
            & member(X,E) )
        | ~ member(M,E)
        | least(M,R,E) )
      & ( ( ! [X0] :
              ( apply(R,M,X0)
              | ~ member(X0,E) )
          & member(M,E) )
        | ~ least(M,R,E) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[least]) ).

fof(sk_least_sk,plain,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( ( ( ~ apply(R,M,sK3(R,E,M))
          & member(sK3(R,E,M),E) )
        | ~ member(M,E)
        | least(M,R,E) )
      & ( ( ! [X0] :
              ( apply(R,M,X0)
              | ~ member(X0,E) )
          & member(M,E) )
        | ~ least(M,R,E) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X,sK3(R,E,M))],[nnf_6]) ).

fof(sk_least,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ apply(VAR_1,VAR_0,sK3(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0))
        | ~ member(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | least(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(sK3(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0),VAR_2)
        | ~ member(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | least(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( apply(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ member(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | ~ least(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ least(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_least_sk]) ).

cnf(c_550,plain,
    ( ~ apply(B,A,sK3(B,C,A))
    | ~ member(A,C)
    | least(A,B,C) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_least]) ).

cnf(c_551,plain,
    ( member(sK3(B,C,A),C)
    | ~ member(A,C)
    | least(A,B,C) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_least]) ).

cnf(c_556,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,B,A)
    | apply(sK0,A,B)
    | ~ member(B,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_322]) ).

cnf(c_1036,plain,
    ( member(sK3(A,sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | least(sK2,A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_551,c_361]) ).

cnf(c_1037,plain,
    ( apply(sK0,A,sK2)
    | apply(sK0,sK2,A)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_556,c_361]) ).

cnf(c_3978,plain,
    ( apply(sK0,sK2,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_1037]) ).

cnf(c_1038,negated_conjecture,
    apply(sK0,sK2,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_3978]) ).

cnf(c_1580,plain,
    member(sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1036,c_549]) ).

cnf(c_1665,plain,
    ( apply(sK0,sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK2)
    | apply(sK0,sK2,sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1037,c_1580]) ).

cnf(c_3979,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK2 = sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | apply(sK0,sK2,sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1665,c_362]) ).

cnf(c_3980,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2) = sK2
    | ~ member(sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK1)
    | apply(sK0,sK2,sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3979]) ).

cnf(c_3969,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2) = sK2
    | apply(sK0,sK2,sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1580,c_3980]) ).

cnf(c_3981,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK2,sK1)
    | least(sK2,sK0,sK1)
    | sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2) = sK2 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3969,c_550]) ).

cnf(c_3982,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(sK2,sK1)
    | sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2) = sK2 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_549,c_3981]) ).

cnf(c_3976,negated_conjecture,
    sK3(sK0,sK1,sK2) = sK2,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_3982]) ).

cnf(c_3983,plain,
    ( ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1)
    | least(sK2,sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3976,c_550]) ).

cnf(c_3984,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK2)
    | ~ member(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_549,c_3983]) ).

cnf(c_3985,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apply(sK0,sK2,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_3984]) ).

cnf(c_3977,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1038,c_3985]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET794+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:18:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 4168582 was started by sandbox2 on n018,
% 0.09/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 08:18:51 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 12.53/2.11  
% 12.53/2.11  % given #500 (I,wt=46): 858 member(f1(A,B),B) | apply(A,f2(A,B),f3(A,B)) | -apply(A,f4(A,B),f6(A,B)) | -member(f4(A,B),B) | -member(f6(A,B),B) | -member(C,B) | -apply(A,f6(A,B),C) | apply(A,f4(A,B),C).  [factor(497,c,g)].
% 12.53/2.11  
% 12.53/2.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 12.53/2.11  
% 12.53/2.11  % Proof 1 at 1.48 (+ 0.17) seconds.
% 12.53/2.11  % Length of proof is 23.
% 12.53/2.11  % Level of proof is 8.
% 12.53/2.11  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 12.53/2.11  % Given clauses 681.
% 12.53/2.11  
% 12.53/2.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------