↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET797+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.20s 1.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  18   ~;  18   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIV9,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X4] :
      ( order(X6,X4)
     => ! [X3,X5] :
          ( ( subset(X3,X4)
            & subset(X5,X4)
            & subset(X3,X5) )
         => ! [X8] :
              ( upper_bound(X8,X6,X5)
             => upper_bound(X8,X6,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIV9) ).

fof(upper_bound,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( upper_bound(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X4)
         => apply(X6,X3,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',upper_bound) ).

fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X4] :
        ( order(X6,X4)
       => ! [X3,X5] :
            ( ( subset(X3,X4)
              & subset(X5,X4)
              & subset(X3,X5) )
           => ! [X8] :
                ( upper_bound(X8,X6,X5)
               => upper_bound(X8,X6,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV9]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X135,X136,X137,X138,X139,X140,X141] :
      ( ( ~ upper_bound(X137,X135,X136)
        | ~ member(X138,X136)
        | apply(X135,X138,X137) )
      & ( member(esk6_3(X139,X140,X141),X140)
        | upper_bound(X141,X139,X140) )
      & ( ~ apply(X139,esk6_3(X139,X140,X141),X141)
        | upper_bound(X141,X139,X140) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[upper_bound])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( order(esk14_0,esk15_0)
    & subset(esk16_0,esk15_0)
    & subset(esk17_0,esk15_0)
    & subset(esk16_0,esk17_0)
    & upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,esk17_0)
    & ~ upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,esk16_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( apply(X2,X4,X1)
    | ~ upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X88,X89,X90,X91,X92] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X88,X89)
        | ~ member(X90,X88)
        | member(X90,X89) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X91,X92),X91)
        | subset(X91,X92) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X91,X92),X92)
        | subset(X91,X92) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk14_0,X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk17_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk16_0,esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_3(esk14_0,X1,esk18_0),esk17_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk17_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_3(esk14_0,X1,esk18_0),esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | upper_bound(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ upper_bound(esk18_0,esk14_0,esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.20  % Problem    : SET797+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.20  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.42  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.42  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.42  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.42  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.42  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.42  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:35:51 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.43  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.45  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.20/1.86  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.20/1.86  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.20/1.86  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.20/1.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.20/1.86  % Total time : 1.384s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------