↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET799+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.64s 1.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  12   ~;   8   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   3 sgn  24   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(upper_bound,axiom,
    ! [R,E,M] :
      ( upper_bound(M,R,E)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,E)
         => apply(R,X,M) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',upper_bound) ).

fof(least_upper_bound,axiom,
    ! [A,X,R,E] :
      ( least_upper_bound(A,X,R,E)
    <=> ( ! [M] :
            ( ( upper_bound(M,R,X)
              & member(M,E) )
           => apply(R,A,M) )
        & upper_bound(A,R,X)
        & member(A,X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',least_upper_bound) ).

fof(thIV11,conjecture,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( order(R,E)
     => ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( subset(X1,X2)
            & subset(X2,E)
            & subset(X1,E) )
         => ! [M1,M2] :
              ( ( least_upper_bound(M2,X2,R,E)
                & least_upper_bound(M1,X1,R,E) )
             => apply(R,M1,M2) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thIV11) ).

fof(thIV11_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [R,E] :
        ( order(R,E)
       => ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( subset(X1,X2)
              & subset(X2,E)
              & subset(X1,E) )
           => ! [M1,M2] :
                ( ( least_upper_bound(M2,X2,R,E)
                  & least_upper_bound(M1,X1,R,E) )
               => apply(R,M1,M2) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV11]) ).

fof(nnf_22,plain,
    ? [R,E] :
      ( ? [X1,X2] :
          ( ? [M1,M2] :
              ( ~ apply(R,M1,M2)
              & least_upper_bound(M2,X2,R,E)
              & least_upper_bound(M1,X1,R,E) )
          & subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X2,E)
          & subset(X1,E) )
      & order(R,E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thIV11_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thIV11_neg,plain,
    ( ~ apply(sK3,sK2,sK5)
    & least_upper_bound(sK5,sK1,sK3,sK4)
    & least_upper_bound(sK2,sK0,sK3,sK4)
    & subset(sK0,sK1)
    & subset(sK1,sK4)
    & subset(sK0,sK4)
    & order(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4,sK0,sK1,sK2,sK5]),skolemize(R,sK3),skolemize(E,sK4),skolemize(X1,sK0),skolemize(X2,sK1),skolemize(M1,sK2),skolemize(M2,sK5)],[nnf_22]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV11_neg]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

cnf(c_370,plain,
    ( upper_bound(A,C,B)
    | ~ least_upper_bound(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[least_upper_bound]) ).

cnf(c_371,plain,
    ( member(A,B)
    | ~ least_upper_bound(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[least_upper_bound]) ).

cnf(c_374,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(sK2,sK0,sK3,sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV11_neg]) ).

cnf(c_375,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(sK5,sK1,sK3,sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV11_neg]) ).

cnf(c_388,negated_conjecture,
    upper_bound(sK5,sK3,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_375,c_370]) ).

cnf(c_390,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_374,c_371]) ).

cnf(c_585,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apply(sK3,sK2,sK5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIV11_neg]) ).

cnf(c_588,plain,
    ( apply(B,D,A)
    | ~ member(D,C)
    | ~ upper_bound(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[upper_bound]) ).

cnf(c_620,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(A,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_1222,plain,
    ( apply(sK3,A,sK5)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_588,c_388]) ).

cnf(c_1507,plain,
    member(sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_620,c_390]) ).

cnf(c_2189,plain,
    apply(sK3,sK2,sK5),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1222,c_1507]) ).

cnf(c_2188,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_585,c_2189]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET799+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:16:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.37  % Process 2620775 was started by sandbox on n014,
% 0.12/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:16:47 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 6.64/1.37  
% 6.64/1.37  % given #500 (I,wt=53): 889 -apply(A,f4(A,B),f4(A,B)) | apply(A,f5(A,B),f6(A,B)) | -apply(A,f7(A,B),f9(A,B)) | -member(f7(A,B),B) | -member(f9(A,B),B) | -apply(A,f9(A,B),f7(A,B)) | f9(A,B) = f7(A,B).  [factor(442,c,f)].
% 6.64/1.37  
% 6.64/1.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 6.64/1.37  
% 6.64/1.37  % Proof 1 at 0.85 (+ 0.13) seconds.
% 6.64/1.37  % Length of proof is 18.
% 6.64/1.37  % Level of proof is 4.
% 6.64/1.37  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 6.64/1.37  % Given clauses 722.
% 6.64/1.37  
% 6.64/1.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------