↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET802+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  55   ~;  65   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (   3 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIV14,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X4] :
      ( order(X6,X4)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( subset(X3,X4)
         => ! [X8] :
              ( least(X8,X6,X3)
            <=> ( greatest_lower_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4)
                & member(X8,X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIV14) ).

fof(least,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( least(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ( ! [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X4)
           => apply(X6,X8,X3) )
        & member(X8,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',least) ).

fof(lower_bound,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( lower_bound(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X4)
         => apply(X6,X8,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',lower_bound) ).

fof(greatest_lower_bound,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X6,X4] :
      ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3,X6,X4)
    <=> ( ! [X8] :
            ( ( lower_bound(X8,X6,X3)
              & member(X8,X4) )
           => apply(X6,X8,X1) )
        & lower_bound(X1,X6,X3)
        & member(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',greatest_lower_bound) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X4] :
        ( order(X6,X4)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( subset(X3,X4)
           => ! [X8] :
                ( least(X8,X6,X3)
              <=> ( greatest_lower_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4)
                  & member(X8,X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV14]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ( least(X29,X27,X28)
        | ~ member(X29,X28)
        | ~ apply(X27,X29,esk6_3(X27,X28,X29)) )
      & ( least(X29,X27,X28)
        | ~ member(X29,X28)
        | member(esk6_3(X27,X28,X29),X28) )
      & ( ~ least(X25,X23,X24)
        | apply(X23,X25,X26)
        | ~ member(X26,X24) )
      & ( ~ least(X25,X23,X24)
        | member(X25,X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[least])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) )
    & ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | member(esk4_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & subset(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & order(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ least(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | apply(X3,X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45] :
      ( ( lower_bound(X45,X43,X44)
        | ~ apply(X43,X45,esk8_3(X43,X44,X45)) )
      & ( lower_bound(X45,X43,X44)
        | member(esk8_3(X43,X44,X45),X44) )
      & ( apply(X39,X41,X42)
        | ~ member(X42,X40)
        | ~ lower_bound(X41,X39,X40) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[lower_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk3_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,X1)
    | greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( lower_bound(X3,X1,X2)
    | member(esk8_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( greatest_lower_bound(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | ~ lower_bound(X18,X20,X19)
        | ~ member(X18,X19)
        | ~ apply(X20,esk5_4(X18,X19,X20,X21),X18) )
      & ( greatest_lower_bound(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | ~ lower_bound(X18,X20,X19)
        | ~ member(X18,X19)
        | lower_bound(esk5_4(X18,X19,X20,X21),X20,X19) )
      & ( greatest_lower_bound(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | ~ lower_bound(X18,X20,X19)
        | ~ member(X18,X19)
        | member(esk5_4(X18,X19,X20,X21),X21) )
      & ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(X13,X14,X15,X16)
        | apply(X15,X17,X13)
        | ~ lower_bound(X17,X15,X14)
        | ~ member(X17,X16) )
      & ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(X13,X14,X15,X16)
        | lower_bound(X13,X15,X14) )
      & ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(X13,X14,X15,X16)
        | member(X13,X14) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[greatest_lower_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ apply(X1,X2,esk8_3(X1,X3,X2))
    | lower_bound(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk8_3(X2,esk3_0,X1))
    | lower_bound(X1,X2,esk3_0)
    | greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3,X2,X4)
    | lower_bound(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | apply(X2,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    lower_bound(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ least(X1,X3,X2)
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk4_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X1,X2,esk6_3(X1,X3,X2))
    | least(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk3_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_3(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0),esk3_0)
    | least(esk4_0,esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X2)
    | least(X3,X1,X2)
    | member(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | lower_bound(esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ lower_bound(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X1,esk5_4(X2,X3,X1,X4),X2)
    | greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | apply(X3,esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5)
    | greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_17]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET802+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:34:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % new_bool_1 with pid 1537708 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1537710 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 22
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 86
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 86
% 0.11/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 92
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 91
% 0.11/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.11/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 70
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 58
% 0.11/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 68
% 0.11/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 15
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 78
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.11/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 69
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48
% 0.11/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 262
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.11/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1354
% 0.11/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 505
% 0.11/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.11/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.11/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6621
% 0.11/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1228
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3928 pages
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------