↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET804+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 5.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  37   ~;  30   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   2 sgn  34   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIV16,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( order(X1,X2)
     => ! [X8,X9] :
          ( ( X8 != X9
            & min(X9,X1,X2)
            & min(X8,X1,X2) )
         => ~ ? [X6] : least(X6,X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIV16) ).

fof(min,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X6] :
      ( min(X6,X1,X2)
    <=> ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( apply(X1,X3,X6)
              & member(X3,X2) )
           => X6 = X3 )
        & member(X6,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',min) ).

fof(least,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X6] :
      ( least(X6,X1,X2)
    <=> ( ! [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X2)
           => apply(X1,X6,X3) )
        & member(X6,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',least) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( order(X1,X2)
       => ! [X8,X9] :
            ( ( X8 != X9
              & min(X9,X1,X2)
              & min(X8,X1,X2) )
           => ~ ? [X6] : least(X6,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV16]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( order(X1,X2)
       => ! [X8,X9] :
            ( ( X8 != X9
              & min(X9,X1,X2)
              & min(X8,X1,X2) )
           => ~ ? [X6] : least(X6,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ( min(X29,X27,X28)
        | ~ member(X29,X28)
        | X29 != esk7_3(X27,X28,X29) )
      & ( min(X29,X27,X28)
        | ~ member(X29,X28)
        | apply(X27,esk7_3(X27,X28,X29),X29) )
      & ( min(X29,X27,X28)
        | ~ member(X29,X28)
        | member(esk7_3(X27,X28,X29),X28) )
      & ( ~ min(X25,X23,X24)
        | X25 = X26
        | ~ apply(X23,X26,X25)
        | ~ member(X26,X24) )
      & ( ~ min(X25,X23,X24)
        | member(X25,X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[min])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk5_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & esk3_0 != esk4_0
    & min(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & min(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & order(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( least(X21,X19,X20)
        | ~ member(X21,X20)
        | ~ apply(X19,X21,esk6_3(X19,X20,X21)) )
      & ( least(X21,X19,X20)
        | ~ member(X21,X20)
        | member(esk6_3(X19,X20,X21),X20) )
      & ( ~ least(X17,X15,X16)
        | apply(X15,X17,X18)
        | ~ member(X18,X16) )
      & ( ~ least(X17,X15,X16)
        | member(X17,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[least])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ min(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ apply(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    min(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ least(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | apply(X3,X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    least(esk5_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ least(X1,X3,X2)
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ min(X1,X3,X2)
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ apply(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0)
    | X1 = esk4_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk5_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk5_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk4_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    min(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ apply(esk1_0,X1,esk3_0)
    | X1 = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_17]),c_0_22])]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET804+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/5.42  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:40:36 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.42  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % new_bool_3 with pid 3518902 completed with status 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/5.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/5.53  % Search class: FGUSF-FFLS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/5.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3518909 completed with status 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/5.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/5.53  % Search class: FGUSF-FFLS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/5.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/5.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/5.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.17/5.53  
% 0.17/5.53  % Proof found!
% 0.17/5.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/5.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/5.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.17/5.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.17/5.53  % Initial clauses                      : 79
% 0.17/5.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 79
% 0.17/5.53  % Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.17/5.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.17/5.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 0.17/5.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.17/5.53  % Generated clauses                    : 13
% 0.17/5.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.17/5.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.17/5.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.17/5.53  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.17/5.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/5.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.17/5.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.17/5.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/5.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/5.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.17/5.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.17/5.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 255
% 0.17/5.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.17/5.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 82
% 0.17/5.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 0.17/5.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.17/5.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.17/5.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.17/5.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.17/5.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/5.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4006
% 0.17/5.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 959
% 0.17/5.53  
% 0.17/5.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/5.53  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.17/5.53  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.17/5.53  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.17/5.53  % Maximum resident set size: 3860 pages
% 0.17/5.53  
% 0.17/5.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/5.53  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.17/5.53  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.17/5.53  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.17/5.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.17/5.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------