↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET810+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  33   ~;  23   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn  21   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(ordinal_number,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( member(A,on)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( member(X,A)
           => subset(X,A) )
        & strict_well_order(member_predicate,A)
        & set(A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ordinal_number) ).

fof(strict_well_order,axiom,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( strict_well_order(R,E)
    <=> ( ! [A] :
            ( ( ? [X] : member(X,A)
              & subset(A,E) )
           => ? [Y] : least(Y,R,A) )
        & strict_order(R,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',strict_well_order) ).

fof(rel_member,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( apply(member_predicate,X,Y)
    <=> member(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rel_member) ).

fof(strict_order,axiom,
    ! [R,E] :
      ( strict_order(R,E)
    <=> ( ! [X,Y,Z] :
            ( ( member(Z,E)
              & member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ( ( apply(R,Y,Z)
                & apply(R,X,Y) )
             => apply(R,X,Z) ) )
        & ! [X,Y] :
            ( ( member(Y,E)
              & member(X,E) )
           => ~ ( apply(R,Y,X)
                & apply(R,X,Y) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',strict_order) ).

fof(thV3,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( member(B,on)
        & member(A,on) )
     => ~ ( member(B,A)
          & member(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thV3) ).

fof(thV3_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ( member(B,on)
          & member(A,on) )
       => ~ ( member(B,A)
            & member(A,B) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thV3]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ apply(A,D,C)
    | ~ apply(A,C,D)
    | ~ member(D,B)
    | ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ strict_order(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[strict_order]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    ( strict_order(A,B)
    | ~ strict_well_order(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[strict_well_order]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( ~ apply(A,D,C)
    | ~ apply(A,C,D)
    | ~ member(D,B)
    | ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ strict_well_order(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_176,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

cnf(c_203,plain,
    ( strict_well_order(member_predicate,A)
    | ~ member(A,on) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ordinal_number]) ).

cnf(c_204,plain,
    ( subset(B,A)
    | ~ member(B,A)
    | ~ member(A,on) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ordinal_number]) ).

cnf(c_215,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,B)
    | apply(member_predicate,A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rel_member]) ).

fof(nnf_20,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( member(B,A)
      & member(A,B)
      & member(B,on)
      & member(A,on) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thV3_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thV3_neg,plain,
    ( member(sK0,sK1)
    & member(sK1,sK0)
    & member(sK0,on)
    & member(sK1,on) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_20]) ).

cnf(c_223,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,on),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thV3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_224,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thV3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_225,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thV3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2543,plain,
    strict_well_order(member_predicate,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_203]) ).

cnf(c_2553,plain,
    apply(member_predicate,sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_215]) ).

cnf(c_2840,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ member(sK0,on) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_204]) ).

cnf(c_2556,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_2840]) ).

cnf(c_2565,plain,
    apply(member_predicate,sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_215]) ).

cnf(c_2592,plain,
    ( member(A,sK0)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2556,c_176]) ).

cnf(c_2841,plain,
    ( ~ apply(member_predicate,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ member(sK1,A)
    | ~ member(sK0,A)
    | ~ strict_well_order(member_predicate,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2553,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_2821,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1,A)
    | ~ member(sK0,A)
    | ~ strict_well_order(member_predicate,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2565,c_2841]) ).

cnf(c_2842,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ member(sK0,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2821,c_2543]) ).

cnf(c_2836,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK0,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_2842]) ).

cnf(c_2843,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2592,c_225]) ).

cnf(c_2839,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2836,c_2843]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET810+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:19:38 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.45  % Process 4169418 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.17/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:19:38 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.47  
% 0.17/0.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 3.49/0.97  
% 3.49/0.97  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.49/0.97  
% 3.49/0.97  % Proof 1 at 0.41 (+ 0.08) seconds.
% 3.49/0.97  % Length of proof is 24.
% 3.49/0.97  % Level of proof is 5.
% 3.49/0.97  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 3.49/0.97  % Given clauses 261.
% 3.49/0.97  
% 3.49/0.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------