↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:48:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.60s 1.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  11   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f170,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_less(X1,X1,X0)
      | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Orderings_Oorder__less__irrefl__iff1_0) ).

fof(f227,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).

fof(f375,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsingletonD__dest_0) ).

fof(f428,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_IntDef_Oint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',clsarity_IntDef__Oint_31) ).

fof(f1434,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_a,v_b,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f1435,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_b,v_c,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1436,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_in(v_a,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | ~ c_in(v_b,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | c_in(v_c,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

tcf(c_1531,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
      | ~ c_less(X0,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f170]) ).

tcf(c_1584,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f227]) ).

tcf(c_1709,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,X2),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f375]) ).

tcf(c_1733,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f428]) ).

tcf(c_2000,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_a,v_b,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1434]) ).

tcf(c_2001,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_b,v_c,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1435]) ).

tcf(c_2002,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(v_c,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | c_in(v_a,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | ~ c_in(v_b,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1436]) ).

tcf(c_13396,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(v_c,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | c_in(v_a,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | ~ c_in(v_b,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2002]) ).

tcf(c_13397,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_b,v_c,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2001]) ).

tcf(c_13398,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(v_a,v_b,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2000]) ).

tcf(c_18671,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(v_c,c_insert(v_b,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint),tc_IntDef_Oint)
      | c_in(v_a,c_insert(v_b,X0,tc_IntDef_Oint),tc_IntDef_Oint) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1584,c_13396]) ).

tcf(c_19106,plain,
    ( c_in(v_a,c_insert(v_b,c_emptyset,tc_IntDef_Oint),tc_IntDef_Oint)
    | ( v_b = v_c ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_18671,c_1709]) ).

tcf(c_19143,plain,
    ( ( v_b = v_c )
    | ( v_a = v_b ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_19106,c_1709]) ).

tcf(c_19156,plain,
    ( c_less(v_b,v_b,tc_IntDef_Oint)
    | ( v_a = v_b ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_19143,c_13397]) ).

tcf(c_19182,plain,
    ( ( v_a = v_b )
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_IntDef_Oint) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_19156,c_1531]) ).

tcf(c_19183,plain,
    v_a = v_b,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19182,c_1733]) ).

tcf(c_19192,plain,
    c_less(v_b,v_b,tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_13398,c_19183]) ).

tcf(c_19208,plain,
    ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_IntDef_Oint),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_19192,c_1531]) ).

tcf(c_19209,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19208,c_1733]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET821-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.42  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:06:26 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.49  
% 0.24/0.49  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.24/0.49  
% 0.24/0.49  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.50  % Proving...
% 3.60/1.25  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.60/1.25  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.60/1.25  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 18 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 30 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Proving...
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % 
% 3.60/1.25  % clauses                               298
% 3.60/1.25  % conjectures                           3
% 3.60/1.25  % EPR                                   29
% 3.60/1.25  % Horn                                  270
% 3.60/1.25  % unary                                 77
% 3.60/1.25  % binary                                173
% 3.60/1.25  % lits                                  567
% 3.60/1.25  % lits eq                               162
% 3.60/1.25  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.60/1.25  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.60/1.25  % fd_cond                               21
% 3.60/1.25  % fd_pseudo_cond                        40
% 3.60/1.25  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ 
% 3.60/1.25  % Current options:
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % ------ Proving...
% 3.60/1.25  % 
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.60/1.25  
% 3.60/1.25  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------