%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET829-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_X,v_Z,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_X,v_Z,tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,v_X,t_a)
| c_in(X1,v_Z,t_a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SET829-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.57 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:39:50 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.65 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.65 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.74 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % new_bool_1 with pid 3248842 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.21/0.74 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.74 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.74 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3248845 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.21/0.74 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.74 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.74 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.74 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.74 % Parsed axioms : 1362
% 0.21/0.74 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 977
% 0.21/0.74 % Initial clauses : 385
% 0.21/0.74 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Initial clauses in saturation : 385
% 0.21/0.74 % Processed clauses : 457
% 0.21/0.74 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % ...subsumed : 74
% 0.21/0.74 % ...remaining for further processing : 383
% 0.21/0.74 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.74 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.21/0.74 % Generated clauses : 135
% 0.21/0.74 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 81
% 0.21/0.74 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Paramodulations : 133
% 0.21/0.74 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.21/0.74 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Total rewrite steps : 55
% 0.21/0.74 % ...of those cached : 26
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.74 % Current number of processed clauses : 379
% 0.21/0.74 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.21/0.74 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.74 % Non-unit-clauses : 337
% 0.21/0.74 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.21/0.74 % ...number of literals in the above : 20
% 0.21/0.74 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.74 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31004
% 0.21/0.74 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30994
% 0.21/0.74 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 74
% 0.21/0.74 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 376
% 0.21/0.74 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.21/0.74 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.21/0.74 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.74 % Termbank termtop insertions : 15308
% 0.21/0.74 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2485
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.74 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.21/0.74 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.74 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.21/0.74 % Maximum resident set size: 4860 pages
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.74 % User time : 0.058 s
% 0.21/0.74 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.74 % Total time : 0.073 s
% 0.21/0.74 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.21/0.74 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------