%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SET832-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:39:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET832-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:01:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.10/0.44 Axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0): c_lessequals(v_Y, v_V, tc_set(t_a)) = true.
% 0.10/0.44 Axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_2): c_in(v_x, v_Y, t_a) = true.
% 0.10/0.44 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.10/0.44 Axiom 4 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0): ifeq(c_lessequals(X, Y, tc_set(Z)), true, ifeq(c_in(W, X, Z), true, c_in(W, Y, Z), true), true) = true.
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_3): c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a) = true.
% 0.10/0.44 Proof:
% 0.10/0.44 c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a)
% 0.10/0.44 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.10/0.44 ifeq(true, true, c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a), true)
% 0.10/0.44 = { by axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_2) R->L }
% 0.10/0.44 ifeq(c_in(v_x, v_Y, t_a), true, c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a), true)
% 0.10/0.44 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.10/0.44 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(c_in(v_x, v_Y, t_a), true, c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a), true), true)
% 0.10/0.44 = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0) R->L }
% 0.10/0.44 ifeq(c_lessequals(v_Y, v_V, tc_set(t_a)), true, ifeq(c_in(v_x, v_Y, t_a), true, c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a), true), true)
% 0.10/0.44 = { by axiom 4 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) }
% 0.10/0.44 true
% 0.10/0.44 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------