%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET833-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 6.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_Z,v_V,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_Z,v_V,tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,v_Z,t_a)
| c_in(X1,v_V,t_a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET833-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.94 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.94 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.94 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.94 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.94 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.94 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.94 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.94 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:40:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.94 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.94 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.98 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/5.98 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/6.00 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2358136 completed with status 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.10/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/6.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/6.00 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/6.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % new_bool_1 with pid 2358144 completed with status 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.10/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/6.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/6.00 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/6.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/6.00 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.10/6.00 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/6.00
% 0.10/6.00 % Proof found!
% 0.10/6.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/6.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/6.00 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.10/6.00 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.10/6.00 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.10/6.00 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.10/6.00 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.10/6.00 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.10/6.00 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.10/6.00 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.10/6.00 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/6.00 % Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.10/6.00 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.10/6.00 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.10/6.00 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.10/6.00 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.10/6.00 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.10/6.00 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/6.00 % Termbank termtop insertions : 122
% 0.10/6.00 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.10/6.00
% 0.10/6.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/6.00 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.10/6.00 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/6.00 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/6.00 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 0.10/6.00
% 0.10/6.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/6.00 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.10/6.00 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.10/6.00 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.10/6.00 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/6.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------