↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET834-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  12 unt;   6 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (   0 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_Y,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_Z,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_X,X1,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_Y,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_Z,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_X,X1,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4),X3,X4)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_Y,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_Z,X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_X,X1,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X1,X3),tc_set(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4),X2,X4)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_Z,c_union(X1,v_Y,t_a),tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_X,c_union(X1,v_Y,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X1,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_X,c_union(v_Z,v_Y,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_X,t_a)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(v_Z,v_Y,t_a),t_a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_X,t_a)
    | c_in(X1,v_Z,t_a)
    | c_in(X1,v_Y,t_a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET834-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:40:50 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % sh5l with pid 1796953 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1796959 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.12/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 23
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.12/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 21
% 0.12/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 38
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.12/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 36
% 0.12/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.12/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.12/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 0.12/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32
% 0.12/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.12/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.12/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.12/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 868
% 0.12/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 24
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------