↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SET838-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:39:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET838-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 02:57:19 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.31  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.36  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.07/0.36  Axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0): v_f(v_g(v_x)) = v_x.
% 0.07/0.36  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.07/0.36  Axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_1): ifeq(v_f(v_g(X)), X, X, v_x) = v_x.
% 0.07/0.36  Axiom 4 (cls_conjecture_2): ifeq(v_g(v_f(X)), X, v_g(v_f(v_xa(X))), v_xa(X)) = v_xa(X).
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_3): tuple(v_g(v_f(X)), v_xa(X)) = tuple(X, X).
% 0.07/0.36  The goal is true when:
% 0.07/0.36    X = v_g(v_x)
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  Proof:
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_xa(v_g(v_x)))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 4 (cls_conjecture_2) R->L }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x)))), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(ifeq(v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_x)), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 4 (cls_conjecture_2) R->L }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(ifeq(v_f(ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x)))), v_xa(v_g(v_x)))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_x)), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(ifeq(v_f(ifeq(v_g(v_x), v_g(v_x), v_g(v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x)))), v_xa(v_g(v_x)))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_x)), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(ifeq(v_f(v_g(v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_f(v_xa(v_g(v_x))), v_x)), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_1) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x), v_g(v_x), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), ifeq(v_g(v_x), v_g(v_x), v_g(v_x), v_xa(v_g(v_x))))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_f(v_g(v_x))), v_g(v_x))
% 0.07/0.36  = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0) }
% 0.07/0.36    tuple(v_g(v_x), v_g(v_x))
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------