%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET841-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 5.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 6 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| X1 = X4
| c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3),X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
v_m = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| X1 = X4
| c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3),X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| X1 = X4
| c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3),X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
v_x = v_m,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
v_m = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET841-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:36:32 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 1543596 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.44 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.44 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1543601 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.44 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.44 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/5.44
% 0.14/5.44 % Proof found!
% 0.14/5.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/5.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/5.44 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.14/5.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.14/5.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.14/5.44 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.14/5.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.14/5.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.14/5.44 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.14/5.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.14/5.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.14/5.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.14/5.44 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.14/5.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.14/5.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/5.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.14/5.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.14/5.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/5.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/5.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 268
% 0.14/5.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.14/5.44
% 0.14/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.44 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/5.44 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/5.44 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.14/5.44
% 0.14/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/5.44 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/5.44 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/5.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------