%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 4 unt; 3 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 51 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_lessequals(X1,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnionE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnionE_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnionE_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X1,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnionE_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_lessequals(X1,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_lessequals(X1,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnionE_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X2,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_in(X1,v_m,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X1,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnionE_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X2,v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X1,v_m,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X1,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X1,v_m,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),X1,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:42:47 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % sh5l with pid 3525445 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.42 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3525452 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.42 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.42 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.42
% 0.12/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.12/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.12/0.42 % Processed clauses : 15
% 0.12/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.12/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.12/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Paramodulations : 14
% 0.12/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.12/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.12/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.12/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 12
% 0.12/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.12/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.12/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.12/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.12/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 602
% 0.12/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 18
% 0.12/0.42
% 0.12/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.42 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.42 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.42
% 0.12/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.42 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.42 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------