↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET843-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:48:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.40s 6.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  23 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  207 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  53   ~;  52   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   6 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  61   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X1,X2),tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnion__upper_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X1 = X0
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OAbrial__axiom1_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin_OsuccI_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Union(X0,tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X3,X0,tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | X0 != c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ c_in(X3,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Oeq__succ__upper_0) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X3,X0,tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2) != X0
      | ~ c_in(X3,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_m != c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a)
    | v_m != c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_m = c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a))
    | v_m = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X1,X2),tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,X0,X2),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Union(X0,tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X3,c_Zorn_OTFin(X0,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X0,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ( c_Zorn_Osucc(X0,X1,X2) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a) != v_m )
    | ( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) != v_m ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a) = v_m )
    | ( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) = v_m ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_195,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_196,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = tc_set(t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_197,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Union(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_198,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_199,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = tc_set(iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_200,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( iPr_def_13 = v_m )
    | ( iPr_def_12 = v_m ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_198,c_196,c_195,c_197]) ).

tcf(c_201,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( iPr_def_13 != v_m )
    | ( iPr_def_12 != v_m ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_202,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_m,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_573,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_m,iPr_def_13,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_576,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_m,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_573,c_196,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_593,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_set(iPr_def_11))
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,tc_set(iPr_def_11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_596,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_593,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_612,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_m,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_596]) ).

tcf(c_641,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(iPr_def_11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_642,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_641,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_664,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_13,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_669,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ c_in(v_m,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_664,c_195,c_196,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_670,plain,
    c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_669,c_202]) ).

tcf(c_689,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Union(X0,tc_set(t_a)),iPr_def_10,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_698,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Union(X0,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_10,tc_set(iPr_def_14)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_689,c_195,c_196,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_712,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ( v_m != iPr_def_13 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_719,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_m,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_in(v_m,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
      | ( v_m != iPr_def_13 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_712,c_195,c_196,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_720,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_m,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
      | ( v_m != iPr_def_13 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_719,c_202]) ).

tcf(c_730,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_670,c_596]) ).

tcf(c_749,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,tc_set(iPr_def_14)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_698]) ).

tcf(c_751,plain,
    c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_749,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_772,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_m,iPr_def_14)
      | ( v_m = iPr_def_12 )
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_720]) ).

tcf(c_787,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,v_m,iPr_def_14)
    | ( v_m = iPr_def_12 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_751,c_772]) ).

tcf(c_872,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_13 )
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_730,c_642]) ).

tcf(c_877,plain,
    ( ( v_m = iPr_def_12 )
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_m,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_787,c_642]) ).

tcf(c_880,plain,
    v_m = iPr_def_12,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_877,c_612]) ).

tcf(c_895,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_576,c_880]) ).

tcf(c_897,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_13 )
    | ( iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_12 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_880]) ).

tcf(c_900,plain,
    iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_13,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_897]) ).

tcf(c_901,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_872,c_900]) ).

tcf(c_902,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_895,c_901]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET843-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:33 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/5.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.44  
% 0.16/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/5.44  
% 0.16/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/5.45  % Proving...
% 2.40/6.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.40/6.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.40/6.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.40/6.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Proving...
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % 
% 2.40/6.31  % clauses                               15
% 2.40/6.31  % conjectures                           3
% 2.40/6.31  % EPR                                   3
% 2.40/6.31  % Horn                                  14
% 2.40/6.31  % unary                                 8
% 2.40/6.31  % binary                                5
% 2.40/6.31  % lits                                  25
% 2.40/6.31  % lits eq                               11
% 2.40/6.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.40/6.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.40/6.31  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.40/6.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 2.40/6.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ 
% 2.40/6.31  % Current options:
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % ------ Proving...
% 2.40/6.31  % 
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.40/6.31  
% 2.40/6.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------