↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SET846-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:40:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a),c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnion__upper_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X6,X4,tc_set(X5))
    | c_lessequals(X6,c_Union(X4,X5),tc_set(X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnion__upper_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin_OsuccI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X7,c_Zorn_OTFin(X8,X9),tc_set(tc_set(X9)))
    | c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(X8,X7,X9),c_Zorn_OTFin(X8,X9),tc_set(tc_set(X9))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin_OsuccI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X2,X2,tc_set(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X10,c_Zorn_OTFin(X12,X11),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X11))))
    | c_in(c_Union(X10,tc_set(X11)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X12,X11),tc_set(tc_set(X11))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).

cnf(c0,plain,
    c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X14,X13),tc_set(X13)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X14,X13),tc_set(tc_set(X13))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(X16,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X16,X15),tc_set(X15)),X15),c_Zorn_OTFin(X16,X15),tc_set(tc_set(X15))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0,cls_Zorn_OTFin_OsuccI_0]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X22,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X22,X21),tc_set(X21)),X21),c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X22,X21),tc_set(X21)),tc_set(tc_set(X21))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2,cls_Set_OUnion__upper_0]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : SET846-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Wed May  8 19:28:53 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.55  % Version:  1.5
% 0.23/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.55  
% 0.23/0.55  % Initial clauses    : 5
% 0.23/0.55  % Processed clauses  : 9
% 0.23/0.55  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Resolvents computed: 8
% 0.23/0.55  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.23/0.55  % Forward subsumed   : 1
% 0.23/0.55  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.23/0.55  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.23/0.55  % User time          : 0.159 s
% 0.23/0.55  % System time        : 0.018 s
% 0.23/0.55  % Total time         : 0.177 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------