%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SET849-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:44 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET849-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 14:52:39 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.55/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 % File : SET849-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/0.61 % Domain : Set Theory % 0.55/0.61 % Problem : Problem about Zorn's lemma % 0.55/0.61 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/0.61 % English : % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.61 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/0.61 % Names : % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.12 v5.1.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.55/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of literals : 6 ( 2 equ; 3 neg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn) % 0.55/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/0.61 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/0.61 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/0.61 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/0.61 % axioms. % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 c_lessequals(V_A,V_A,tc_set(T_a)) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 ( ~ c_lessequals(V_Y,c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(T_a)))) % 0.55/0.61 | c_in(c_Union(V_Y,tc_set(T_a)),c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(tc_set(T_a))) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 ( ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(T_a)),c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(tc_set(T_a))) % 0.55/0.61 | c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(T_a)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(V_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(V_S,T_a),tc_set(T_a)),T_a) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a) != c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % Proof found % 0.55/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.61 %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:17) % 0.55/0.61 %VarNum:26(SingletonVarNum:7) % 0.55/0.61 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.55/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 0.55/0.61 %SharedTerms:7 % 0.55/0.61 %goalClause: 19 % 0.55/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.55/0.61 [19]~E(f5(a6,f4(f3(a6,a2),f1(a2)),a2),f4(f3(a6,a2),f1(a2))) % 0.55/0.61 [18]P1(x181,x181,f1(x182)) % 0.55/0.61 [21]~P2(f4(f3(x211,x212),f1(x212)),f3(x211,x212),f1(f1(x212)))+E(f5(x211,f4(f3(x211,x212),f1(x212)),x212),f4(f3(x211,x212),f1(x212))) % 0.55/0.61 [20]P2(f4(x201,f1(x202)),f3(x203,x202),f1(f1(x202)))+~P1(x201,f3(x203,x202),f1(f1(f1(x202)))) % 0.55/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.55/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.55/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.55/0.61 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42)) % 0.55/0.61 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51,x53),f3(x52,x53)) % 0.55/0.61 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x63,x61),f3(x63,x62)) % 0.55/0.61 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x71,x73),f4(x72,x73)) % 0.55/0.61 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x83,x81),f4(x83,x82)) % 0.55/0.61 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x91,x93,x94),f5(x92,x93,x94)) % 0.55/0.61 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f5(x103,x101,x104),f5(x103,x102,x104)) % 0.55/0.61 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f5(x113,x114,x111),f5(x113,x114,x112)) % 0.55/0.61 [12]P1(x122,x123,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P1(x121,x123,x124) % 0.55/0.61 [13]P1(x133,x132,x134)+~E(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x131,x134) % 0.55/0.61 [14]P1(x143,x144,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144,x141) % 0.55/0.61 [15]P2(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P2(x151,x153,x154) % 0.55/0.61 [16]P2(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P2(x163,x161,x164) % 0.55/0.61 [17]P2(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P2(x173,x174,x171) % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 cnf(24,plain, % 0.55/0.61 ($false), % 0.55/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,18,21,20]), % 0.55/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------