↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET852-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:48:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.98s 6.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  11 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  150 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  16   ~;  40   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   5 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  45   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(X0,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),X0,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | c_in(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0_1) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X1,tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X1,X0,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0_2) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),X0,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3))
      | c_in(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,X3),X0,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,X3),X1,tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X1,X0,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_93,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),X0,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_135,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_136,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = tc_set(t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_137,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = tc_set(iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_138,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_Union(v_Y,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_139,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,X0,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(X1,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,v_Y,iPr_def_11),v_m,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_138,c_137,c_136,c_135]) ).

tcf(c_140,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_141,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,v_m,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

tcf(c_318,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),tc_set(iPr_def_11))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),X0,tc_set(iPr_def_11))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,iPr_def_11),X0,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_319,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),X0,iPr_def_12)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X0,X1,X2,iPr_def_11),X0,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_318,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_335,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,v_m,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,iPr_def_11),v_m,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(v_m,X0,v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_319]) ).

tcf(c_336,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,v_m,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(v_m,X0,v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_138]) ).

tcf(c_337,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(v_m,X0,v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_336,c_141]) ).

tcf(c_348,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),tc_set(iPr_def_11))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),X1,tc_set(iPr_def_11))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X1,X0,X2,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_349,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12)
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(X2,iPr_def_11),X1,iPr_def_12)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Zorn_OUnion__lemma0__1(X1,X0,X2,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_348,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_381,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12)
    | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,c_Union(v_Y,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12)
    | c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,iPr_def_11),v_m,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_349]) ).

tcf(c_382,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,v_m,iPr_def_12)
    | c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_381,c_138]) ).

tcf(c_383,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_382,c_141,c_140]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET852-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.06/5.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/5.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/5.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/5.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/5.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/5.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/5.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/5.31  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:13:28 UTC 2026
% 0.06/5.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/5.32  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.06/5.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.06/5.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/5.34  
% 0.06/5.34  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.06/5.34  
% 0.06/5.34  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.06/5.35  % Proving...
% 0.98/6.07  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/6.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.98/6.07  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.98/6.07  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Proving...
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % 
% 0.98/6.07  % clauses                               9
% 0.98/6.07  % conjectures                           2
% 0.98/6.07  % EPR                                   2
% 0.98/6.07  % Horn                                  6
% 0.98/6.07  % unary                                 6
% 0.98/6.07  % binary                                0
% 0.98/6.07  % lits                                  16
% 0.98/6.07  % lits eq                               4
% 0.98/6.07  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.98/6.07  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.98/6.07  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.98/6.07  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.98/6.07  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ 
% 0.98/6.07  % Current options:
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % ------ Proving...
% 0.98/6.07  % 
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.98/6.07  
% 0.98/6.07  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------