↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET865-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   60 (   7 equ;  36 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X4,X3),X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_Union(X4,X3) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_in(c_Union(X1,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__subset__chain_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X1,X2),c_Zorn_Ochain(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__subset__chain_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OHausdorff_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,X2),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OHausdorff_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | X1 != v_x(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(v_x(X1),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X4,X3),X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_Union(X4,X3) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_in(c_Union(X1,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X1,X2),c_Zorn_Ochain(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))),
    cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__subset__chain_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X4,X3),X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_Union(X4,X3) = X1 ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,X2),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))),
    cls_Zorn_OHausdorff_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | X1 != v_x(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_in(c_Union(X1,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,X2),X2),X3,tc_set(X2))
    | c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,X2),X2) = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | X1 != v_x(X1) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(v_x(X1),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_in(c_Union(X1,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(X1,t_a),t_a)),X1,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(v_x(X1),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET865-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:44:58 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1091974 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43  % Search class: FHHSS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % partial match(1): FHHSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1091979 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43  % Search class: FHHSS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % partial match(1): FHHSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.11/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.11/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.11/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 22
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 22
% 0.11/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.11/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.11/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 7
% 0.11/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.11/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.11/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.11/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.11/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.11/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.11/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 660
% 0.11/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 25
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------