↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET867+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  40   ~;  41   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   3 sgn  39   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( A = empty_set
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = union(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> ? [D] :
              ( in(D,A)
              & in(C,D) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(t2_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    union(empty_set) = empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t2_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    union(empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_2,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( ? [B] : in(B,A)
        | empty_set = A )
      & ( ! [X0] : ~ in(X0,A)
        | empty_set != A ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(sk_d1_xboole_0_sk,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( in(sK0(A),A)
        | empty_set = A )
      & ( ! [X0] : ~ in(X0,A)
        | empty_set != A ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0(A))],[nnf_2]) ).

fof(sk_d1_xboole_0,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0),VAR_0)
        | empty_set = VAR_0 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | empty_set != VAR_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_xboole_0_sk]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,A)
    | empty_set != A ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A),A)
    | empty_set = A ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [C] :
            ( ( ! [D] :
                  ( ~ in(D,A)
                  | ~ in(C,D) )
              | ~ in(C,B) )
            & ( ? [X0] :
                  ( in(X0,A)
                  & in(C,X0) )
              | in(C,B) ) )
        | union(A) = B )
      & ( ! [X1] :
            ( ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,A)
                  | ~ in(X1,X3) )
              | in(X1,B) )
            & ( ? [X2] :
                  ( in(X2,A)
                  & in(X1,X2) )
              | ~ in(X1,B) ) )
        | union(A) != B ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d4_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ( ! [D] :
                ( ~ in(D,A)
                | ~ in(sK2(A,B),D) )
            | ~ in(sK2(A,B),B) )
          & ( ( in(sK3(A,B),A)
              & in(sK2(A,B),sK3(A,B)) )
            | in(sK2(A,B),B) ) )
        | union(A) = B )
      & ( ! [X1] :
            ( ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,A)
                  | ~ in(X1,X3) )
              | in(X1,B) )
            & ( ( in(sK1(A,B,X1),A)
                & in(X1,sK1(A,B,X1)) )
              | ~ in(X1,B) ) )
        | union(A) != B ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X2,sK1(A,B,X1)),skolemize(C,sK2(A,B)),skolemize(X0,sK3(A,B))],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_d4_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ in(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_2)
        | ~ in(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) = VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | in(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) = VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1))
        | in(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) = VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_0)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_3)
        | in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) != VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_0)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) != VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(VAR_2,sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2))
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | union(VAR_0) != VAR_1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d4_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( in(sK1(A,B,C),A)
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | union(A) != B ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d4_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    union(empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t2_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ~ in(A,empty_set),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( in(sK1(B,union(B),A),B)
    | ~ in(A,union(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_11]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    ~ in(A,union(empty_set)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    empty_set = union(empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    union(empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_53]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET867+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:26:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 1249738 was started by sandbox on n002,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:26:20 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 17.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------