↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET872+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.51s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  22   ~;  19   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   4 sgn  29   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t12_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] : subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t12_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t12_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( C = A
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_5,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [C] :
            ( ~ in(C,B)
            & in(C,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
          & in(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(C,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_5]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [A,B] : ~ subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t12_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ~ subset(singleton(sK1),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(singleton(sK1),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t12_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_12]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    ( A != C
    | in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    in(sK0(singleton(sK1),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),singleton(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(singleton(sK1),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_189,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(B,A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_48]) ).

cnf(c_225,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_189]) ).

cnf(c_936,plain,
    sK0(singleton(sK1),unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)) = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_939,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK1,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_936,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_938,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_939]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET872+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:21:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.38  % Process 3284597 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.10/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 08:21:24 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.51/0.65  
% 1.51/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.51/0.65  
% 1.51/0.65  % Proof 1 at 0.18 (+ 0.07) seconds.
% 1.51/0.65  % Length of proof is 19.
% 1.51/0.65  % Level of proof is 5.
% 1.51/0.65  % Maximum clause weight is 25.000.
% 1.51/0.65  % Given clauses 97.
% 1.51/0.65  
% 1.51/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------