↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET873+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.64s 0.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SET873+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 11:50:39 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.64/0.77  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.64/0.77  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.64/0.77  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.64/0.77  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.64/0.77  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  % Result      :Theorem 0.230000s
% 0.64/0.77  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.230000s
% 0.64/0.77  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  % File     : SET873+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.64/0.77  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.64/0.77  % Problem  : union(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = singleton(A) => A = B
% 0.64/0.77  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.64/0.77  % English  :
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.64/0.77  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.64/0.77  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.64/0.77  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t13_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.64/0.77  % Rating   : 0.11 v7.5.0, 0.12 v7.4.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.11 v5.4.0, 0.14 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.12 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.22 v4.0.0, 0.21 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.4.0, 0.16 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.64/0.77  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   5 unt;   0 def)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Number of atoms       :   18 (   6 equ)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.64/0.77  %                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.64/0.77  %            Number of variables   :   21 (  19   !;   2   ?)
% 0.64/0.77  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.64/0.77  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.64/0.77  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( in(A,B)
% 0.64/0.77       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( B = singleton(A)
% 0.64/0.77      <=> ! [C] :
% 0.64/0.77            ( in(C,B)
% 0.64/0.77          <=> C = A ) ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(fc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.64/0.77       => ~ empty(set_union2(A,B)) ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(fc3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.64/0.77       => ~ empty(set_union2(B,A)) ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,A) = A ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(l21_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( subset(set_union2(singleton(A),B),B)
% 0.64/0.77       => in(A,B) ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  fof(t13_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.64/0.77      ! [A,B] :
% 0.64/0.77        ( set_union2(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = singleton(A)
% 0.64/0.77       => A = B ) ).
% 0.64/0.77  
% 0.64/0.77  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.77  % Proof found
% 0.64/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.64/0.77  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.64/0.78  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:13)
% 0.64/0.78  %VarNum:52(SingletonVarNum:22)
% 0.64/0.78  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.64/0.78  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.64/0.78  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.64/0.78  %goalClause: 17 19
% 0.64/0.78  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.64/0.78  [14]P1(a1)
% 0.64/0.78  [19]~E(a6,a4)
% 0.64/0.78  [20]~P1(a5)
% 0.64/0.78  [17]E(f3(f7(a4),f7(a6)),f7(a4))
% 0.64/0.78  [15]P2(x151,x151)
% 0.64/0.78  [16]E(f3(x161,x161),x161)
% 0.64/0.78  [18]E(f3(x181,x182),f3(x182,x181))
% 0.64/0.78  [23]~P3(x232,x231)+~P3(x231,x232)
% 0.64/0.78  [24]P1(x241)+~P1(f3(x242,x241))
% 0.64/0.78  [25]P1(x251)+~P1(f3(x251,x252))
% 0.64/0.78  [28]P3(x281,x282)+~P2(f3(f7(x281),x282),x282)
% 0.64/0.78  [26]E(f2(x262,x261),x262)+P3(f2(x262,x261),x261)+E(x261,f7(x262))
% 0.64/0.78  [27]~E(f2(x272,x271),x272)+~P3(f2(x272,x271),x271)+E(x271,f7(x272))
% 0.64/0.78  [21]P3(x211,x212)+~E(x211,x213)+~E(x212,f7(x213))
% 0.64/0.78  [22]~P3(x221,x223)+E(x221,x222)+~E(x223,f7(x222))
% 0.64/0.78  %EqnAxiom
% 0.64/0.78  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.64/0.78  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.64/0.78  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.64/0.78  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43),f3(x42,x43))
% 0.64/0.78  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51),f3(x53,x52))
% 0.64/0.78  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x61),f7(x62))
% 0.64/0.78  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x71,x73),f2(x72,x73))
% 0.64/0.78  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f2(x83,x81),f2(x83,x82))
% 0.64/0.78  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.64/0.78  [10]P2(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 0.64/0.78  [11]P2(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x111)
% 0.64/0.78  [12]P3(x122,x123)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x121,x123)
% 0.64/0.78  [13]P3(x133,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x131)
% 0.64/0.78  
% 0.64/0.78  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (~P3(x291,f7(x292))+E(x291,x292)),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(equality_inference,[],[22])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (~P3(a6,f7(a4))),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,29])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (E(f3(x341,x341),x341)),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(rename_variables,[],[16])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (E(f3(x371,x371),x371)),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(rename_variables,[],[16])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (E(f3(x401,x401),x401)),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(rename_variables,[],[16])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (P2(f7(a4),f3(f7(a4),f7(a6)))),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,19,15,16,34,37,40,20,29,2,21,22,3,9,10])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (P2(x441,x441)),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (P2(f3(f7(a4),f7(a6)),f7(a4))),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,19,15,44,16,34,37,40,20,29,2,21,22,3,9,10,11])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(239,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     (E(f3(x2391,x2392),f3(x2392,x2391))),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(rename_variables,[],[18])).
% 0.72/0.78  cnf(242,plain,
% 0.72/0.78     ($false),
% 0.72/0.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,239,45,43,30,10,11,28]),
% 0.72/0.78     ['proof']).
% 0.72/0.78  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.72/0.78  % Total time :0.230000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------