↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET873+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  15   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   1 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l21_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2),X2)
     => in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l21_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t13_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ~ subset(set_union2(singleton(X41),X42),X42)
      | in(X41,X42) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l21_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] : set_union2(X27,X28) = set_union2(X28,X27),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
       => X1 = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t13_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( ~ in(X31,X30)
        | X31 = X29
        | X30 != singleton(X29) )
      & ( X32 != X29
        | in(X32,X30)
        | X30 != singleton(X29) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X33,X34),X34)
        | esk1_2(X33,X34) != X33
        | X34 = singleton(X33) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X33,X34),X34)
        | esk1_2(X33,X34) = X33
        | X34 = singleton(X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_union2(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)) = singleton(esk4_0)
    & esk4_0 != esk5_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X45] : subset(X45,X45),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(set_union2(X2,singleton(X1)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)) = singleton(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != esk5_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET873+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:37:51 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.71  % Total time : 1.367s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------