↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET874+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.73s 5.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem    : SET874+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 17:31:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 5.73/5.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.83  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 5.73/5.83  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 5.73/5.83  % Transform   :cnf
% 5.73/5.83  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 5.73/5.83  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 5.73/5.83  
% 5.73/5.83  % Result      :Theorem 5.290000s
% 5.73/5.83  % Output      :CNFRefutation 5.290000s
% 5.73/5.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.84  % File     : SET874+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 5.73/5.84  % Domain   : Set theory
% 5.73/5.84  % Problem  : union(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = unordered_pair(A,B)
% 5.73/5.84  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 5.73/5.84  % English  :
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 5.73/5.84  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 5.73/5.84  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 5.73/5.84  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t14_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  % Status   : Theorem
% 5.73/5.84  % Rating   : 0.08 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.20 v6.1.0, 0.23 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.11 v5.4.0, 0.18 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.21 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.0, 0.21 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.21 v3.2.0
% 5.73/5.84  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Number of atoms       :   18 (   8 equ)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   6   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
% 5.73/5.84  %                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 5.73/5.84  %            Number of variables   :   22 (  20   !;   2   ?)
% 5.73/5.84  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 5.73/5.84  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 5.73/5.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.84  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] :
% 5.73/5.84        ( in(A,B)
% 5.73/5.84       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B,C] :
% 5.73/5.84        ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
% 5.73/5.84      <=> ! [D] :
% 5.73/5.84            ( in(D,C)
% 5.73/5.84          <=> ( D = A
% 5.73/5.84              | D = B ) ) ) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(fc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] :
% 5.73/5.84        ( ~ empty(A)
% 5.73/5.84       => ~ empty(set_union2(A,B)) ) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(fc3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] :
% 5.73/5.84        ( ~ empty(A)
% 5.73/5.84       => ~ empty(set_union2(B,A)) ) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,A) = A ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(l23_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] :
% 5.73/5.84        ( in(A,B)
% 5.73/5.84       => set_union2(singleton(A),B) = B ) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 5.73/5.84      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  fof(t14_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 5.73/5.84      ! [A,B] : set_union2(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = unordered_pair(A,B) ).
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.84  % Proof found
% 5.73/5.84  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.73/5.84  % SZS output start Proof
% 5.73/5.84  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:14)
% 5.73/5.84  %VarNum:86(SingletonVarNum:34)
% 5.73/5.84  %MaxLitNum:4
% 5.73/5.84  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 5.73/5.84  %SharedTerms:10
% 5.73/5.84  %goalClause: 20
% 5.73/5.84  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 5.73/5.84  [15]P1(a1)
% 5.73/5.84  [19]~P1(a4)
% 5.73/5.84  [20]~E(f3(f8(a5),f7(a5,a6)),f7(a5,a6))
% 5.73/5.84  [16]E(f3(x161,x161),x161)
% 5.73/5.84  [17]E(f7(x171,x172),f7(x172,x171))
% 5.73/5.84  [18]E(f3(x181,x182),f3(x182,x181))
% 5.73/5.84  [24]~P2(x242,x241)+~P2(x241,x242)
% 5.73/5.84  [26]P1(x261)+~P1(f3(x262,x261))
% 5.73/5.84  [27]P1(x271)+~P1(f3(x271,x272))
% 5.73/5.84  [23]~P2(x231,x232)+E(f3(f8(x231),x232),x232)
% 5.73/5.84  [29]~E(f2(x292,x293,x291),x293)+~P2(f2(x292,x293,x291),x291)+E(x291,f7(x292,x293))
% 5.73/5.84  [30]~E(f2(x302,x303,x301),x302)+~P2(f2(x302,x303,x301),x301)+E(x301,f7(x302,x303))
% 5.73/5.84  [21]P2(x211,x212)+~E(x211,x213)+~E(x212,f7(x214,x213))
% 5.73/5.84  [22]P2(x221,x222)+~E(x221,x223)+~E(x222,f7(x223,x224))
% 5.73/5.84  [28]E(f2(x282,x283,x281),x283)+E(f2(x282,x283,x281),x282)+P2(f2(x282,x283,x281),x281)+E(x281,f7(x282,x283))
% 5.73/5.84  [25]~P2(x251,x254)+E(x251,x252)+E(x251,x253)+~E(x254,f7(x253,x252))
% 5.73/5.84  %EqnAxiom
% 5.73/5.84  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 5.73/5.84  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 5.73/5.84  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 5.73/5.84  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43),f3(x42,x43))
% 5.73/5.84  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51),f3(x53,x52))
% 5.73/5.84  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x61,x63),f7(x62,x63))
% 5.73/5.84  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x73,x71),f7(x73,x72))
% 5.73/5.84  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f2(x81,x83,x84),f2(x82,x83,x84))
% 5.73/5.84  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f2(x93,x91,x94),f2(x93,x92,x94))
% 5.73/5.84  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f2(x103,x104,x101),f2(x103,x104,x102))
% 5.73/5.84  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f8(x111),f8(x112))
% 5.73/5.84  [12]~P1(x121)+P1(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 5.73/5.84  [13]P2(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x131,x133)
% 5.73/5.84  [14]P2(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x141)
% 5.73/5.84  
% 5.73/5.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(31,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (~P2(x311,f7(x312,x313))+E(x311,x313)+E(x311,x312)),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(equality_inference,[],[25])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(32,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (~P2(a5,f7(a5,a6))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,23])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(34,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(x341,f3(x341,x341))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,16,23,2])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(1558,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(f7(f3(x15581,x15582),x15583),f7(f3(x15582,x15581),x15583))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,2,6])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(1560,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(f7(f3(x15601,x15602),x15603),f7(f3(x15602,x15601),x15603))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(rename_variables,[],[1558])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(1562,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (P2(f3(x15621,x15622),f7(f3(x15623,x15624),f3(x15622,x15621)))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,1558,1560,22,21])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2507,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (P2(x25071,f7(f3(x25071,x25071),x25072))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,1558,22])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2508,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(f7(f3(x25081,x25082),x25083),f7(f3(x25082,x25081),x25083))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(rename_variables,[],[1558])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2511,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(x25111,f3(x25111,x25111))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(rename_variables,[],[34])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2512,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (P2(x25121,f7(f3(x25122,x25123),f3(x25121,x25121)))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,2511,1558,2508,1562,22,13,21])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2529,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     (E(f7(x25291,x25292),f7(x25292,x25291))),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(rename_variables,[],[17])).
% 5.73/5.85  cnf(2535,plain,
% 5.73/5.85     ($false),
% 5.73/5.85     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,32,2512,2507,16,17,2529,24,14,22,21,31,6]),
% 5.73/5.85     ['proof']).
% 5.73/5.85  % SZS output end Proof
% 5.73/5.85  % Total time :5.290000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------