%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET875+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:03:32 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET875+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 00:35:52 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.12/0.36 # % 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11 % 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.12/0.36 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.36 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.36 # 6 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.36 # 5 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.12/0.36 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (esk5_0=esk4_0)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk4_0)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (empty(esk2_0))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (in(X1,singleton(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~empty(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~disjoint(singleton(X1),X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|~disjoint(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|~in(X1,singleton(X2)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (esk1_2(X1,X2)=X1|X2=singleton(X1)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=singleton(X2)|esk1_2(X2,X1)!=X2|~in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 3 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk4_0))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk4_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk4_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.36 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.36 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.12/0.36 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.36 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------