↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET876+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET876+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 17:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.54/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  % File     : SET876+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.56/0.60  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.56/0.60  % Problem  : A != B => disjoint(singleton(A),singleton(B))
% 0.56/0.60  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.56/0.60  % English  :
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.56/0.60  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.60  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.56/0.60  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t17_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.60  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.5.0, 0.19 v7.4.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.12 v4.1.0, 0.13 v4.0.0, 0.12 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.56/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   13 (   3 equ)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Number of connectives :   10 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.56/0.60  %                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.56/0.60  %            Number of variables   :   13 (  11   !;   2   ?)
% 0.56/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.56/0.60  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.56/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.60        ( in(A,B)
% 0.56/0.60       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.60        ( B = singleton(A)
% 0.56/0.60      <=> ! [C] :
% 0.56/0.60            ( in(C,B)
% 0.56/0.60          <=> C = A ) ) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(l28_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.60        ( ~ in(A,B)
% 0.56/0.60       => disjoint(singleton(A),B) ) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.60        ( disjoint(A,B)
% 0.56/0.60       => disjoint(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  fof(t17_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.60        ( A != B
% 0.56/0.60       => disjoint(singleton(A),singleton(B)) ) ).
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.60  %ClaNum:22(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.56/0.60  %VarNum:40(SingletonVarNum:16)
% 0.56/0.60  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.56/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.56/0.60  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.56/0.60  %goalClause: 13 15
% 0.56/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.60  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.56/0.60  [13]~E(a3,a5)
% 0.56/0.60  [14]~P1(a4)
% 0.56/0.60  [15]~P2(f6(a3),f6(a5))
% 0.56/0.60  [19]~P2(x192,x191)+P2(x191,x192)
% 0.56/0.60  [20]~P3(x202,x201)+~P3(x201,x202)
% 0.56/0.60  [18]P3(x181,x182)+P2(f6(x181),x182)
% 0.56/0.60  [21]E(f2(x212,x211),x212)+P3(f2(x212,x211),x211)+E(x211,f6(x212))
% 0.56/0.60  [22]~E(f2(x222,x221),x222)+~P3(f2(x222,x221),x221)+E(x221,f6(x222))
% 0.56/0.60  [16]P3(x161,x162)+~E(x161,x163)+~E(x162,f6(x163))
% 0.56/0.60  [17]~P3(x171,x173)+E(x171,x172)+~E(x173,f6(x172))
% 0.56/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.60  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42))
% 0.56/0.60  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51,x53),f2(x52,x53))
% 0.56/0.60  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x63,x61),f2(x63,x62))
% 0.56/0.60  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.56/0.60  [8]P3(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P3(x81,x83)
% 0.56/0.60  [9]P3(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P3(x93,x91)
% 0.56/0.60  [10]P2(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 0.56/0.60  [11]P2(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x111)
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~P3(x231,f6(x232))+E(x231,x232)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(equality_inference,[],[17])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     ($false),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,15,23,18]),
% 0.56/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------