%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET876+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:14:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.20s 2.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 8 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 != singleton(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3py_zk4b/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3py_zk4b/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3py_zk4b/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != esk5_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3py_zk4b/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 != singleton(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X1 = X2
| disjoint(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != esk5_0,
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SET876+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 09:11:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.20/2.66 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.20/2.66 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.20/2.66 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.20/2.66 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0026_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 8.20/2.66 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 8.20/2.66 #
% 8.20/2.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 8.20/2.66
% 8.20/2.66 # Proof found!
% 8.20/2.66 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.20/2.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.20/2.66 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.20/2.66
% 8.20/2.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.20/2.66 # User time : 0.020 s
% 8.20/2.66 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.20/2.66 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 8.20/2.66 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.20/2.66
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------