↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET878+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:57:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.15s 1.47s
% Output   : Proof 1.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  27 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (  89 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (  55   ~;  48   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   1 sgn  58   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(l32_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t19_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = singleton(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t19_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f_2_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

fof(f_2_2,plain,
    ! [U_3,U_2] : unordered_pair(U_3,U_2) = unordered_pair(U_2,U_3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_2_1]) ).

cnf(f_2_3,plain,
    unordered_pair(U_3,U_2) = unordered_pair(U_2,U_3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_2]) ).

fof(f_3_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(f_3_2,plain,
    ! [U_5,U_4] : set_intersection2(U_5,U_4) = set_intersection2(U_4,U_5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

cnf(f_3_3,plain,
    set_intersection2(U_5,U_4) = set_intersection2(U_4,U_5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

fof(f_4_1,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
        | ? [D] :
            ( ( ~ in(D,C)
              & ( D = B
                | D = A ) )
            | ( D != B
              & D != A
              & in(D,C) ) ) )
      & ( ! [D] :
            ( ( in(D,C)
              | ( D != B
                & D != A ) )
            & ( D = B
              | D = A
              | ~ in(D,C) ) )
        | C != unordered_pair(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(f_4_2,plain,
    ! [U_10,U_9,U_8] :
      ( ( U_8 = unordered_pair(U_10,U_9)
        | ? [U_7] :
            ( ( ~ in(U_7,U_8)
              & ( U_7 = U_9
                | U_7 = U_10 ) )
            | ( U_7 != U_9
              & U_7 != U_10
              & in(U_7,U_8) ) ) )
      & ( ! [U_6] :
            ( ( in(U_6,U_8)
              | ( U_6 != U_9
                & U_6 != U_10 ) )
            & ( U_6 = U_9
              | U_6 = U_10
              | ~ in(U_6,U_8) ) )
        | U_8 != unordered_pair(U_10,U_9) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_4_1]) ).

fof(f_4_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_20,U_18,U_16] :
        ( U_16 = unordered_pair(U_20,U_18)
        | ? [U_14] :
            ( ~ in(U_14,U_16)
            & ( U_14 = U_18
              | U_14 = U_20 ) )
        | ? [U_13] :
            ( U_13 != U_18
            & U_13 != U_20
            & in(U_13,U_16) ) )
    & ! [U_19,U_17,U_15] :
        ( ( ! [U_12] :
              ( in(U_12,U_15)
              | ( U_12 != U_17
                & U_12 != U_19 ) )
          & ! [U_11] :
              ( U_11 = U_17
              | U_11 = U_19
              | ~ in(U_11,U_15) ) )
        | U_15 != unordered_pair(U_19,U_17) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_4_2]) ).

fof(f_4_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_20,U_18,U_16] :
        ( U_16 = unordered_pair(U_20,U_18)
        | ? [U_14] :
            ( ~ in(U_14,U_16)
            & ( U_14 = U_18
              | U_14 = U_20 ) )
        | ( sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16) != U_18
          & sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16) != U_20
          & in(sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16),U_16) ) )
    & ! [U_19,U_17,U_15] :
        ( ( ! [U_12] :
              ( in(U_12,U_15)
              | ( U_12 != U_17
                & U_12 != U_19 ) )
          & ! [U_11] :
              ( U_11 = U_17
              | U_11 = U_19
              | ~ in(U_11,U_15) ) )
        | U_15 != unordered_pair(U_19,U_17) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_13,sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16))],[f_4_3]) ).

fof(f_4_5,plain,
    ( ! [U_20,U_18,U_16] :
        ( U_16 = unordered_pair(U_20,U_18)
        | ( ~ in(sK2(U_20,U_18,U_16),U_16)
          & ( sK2(U_20,U_18,U_16) = U_18
            | sK2(U_20,U_18,U_16) = U_20 ) )
        | ( sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16) != U_18
          & sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16) != U_20
          & in(sK1(U_20,U_18,U_16),U_16) ) )
    & ! [U_19,U_17,U_15] :
        ( ( ! [U_12] :
              ( in(U_12,U_15)
              | ( U_12 != U_17
                & U_12 != U_19 ) )
          & ! [U_11] :
              ( U_11 = U_17
              | U_11 = U_19
              | ~ in(U_11,U_15) ) )
        | U_15 != unordered_pair(U_19,U_17) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_14,sK2(U_20,U_18,U_16))],[f_4_4]) ).

cnf(f_4_8,plain,
    ( U_12 != U_17
    | in(U_12,U_15)
    | U_15 != unordered_pair(U_19,U_17) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_4_5]) ).

fof(f_6_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A)
      | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l32_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_6_2,plain,
    ! [U_24,U_23] :
      ( set_intersection2(U_23,singleton(U_24)) = singleton(U_24)
      | ~ in(U_24,U_23) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_6_1]) ).

cnf(f_6_3,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(U_23,singleton(U_24)) = singleton(U_24)
    | ~ in(U_24,U_23) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_2]) ).

fof(f_9_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = singleton(A),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[t19_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_9_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B] : set_intersection2(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) != singleton(A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_9_1]) ).

fof(f_9_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_28,U_27] : set_intersection2(singleton(U_28),unordered_pair(U_28,U_27)) != singleton(U_28),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_9_2]) ).

fof(f_9_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_27] : set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,U_27)) != singleton(sK5),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5]),skolemize(U_28,sK5)],[f_9_3]) ).

fof(f_9_5,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) != singleton(sK5),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(U_27,sK6)],[f_9_4]) ).

fof(f_9_6,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) != singleton(sK5),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_9_5]) ).

cnf(f_9_7,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) != singleton(sK5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_9_6]) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) != singleton(sK5),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_9_7]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK6),singleton(sK5)) != singleton(sK5)
    | set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) != set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK6),singleton(sK5))
    | set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) = singleton(sK5) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    set_intersection2(singleton(sK5),unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) = set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK6),singleton(sK5)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_3_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK5,unordered_pair(sK5,sK6))
    | set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK6),singleton(sK5)) = singleton(sK5) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_6_3]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( sK5 != sK5
    | unordered_pair(sK5,sK6) != unordered_pair(sK6,sK5)
    | in(sK5,unordered_pair(sK5,sK6)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_4_8]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK5,sK6) = unordered_pair(sK6,sK5),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[f_2_3]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    sK5 = sK5,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:3)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t8:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET878+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:08:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.15/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.15/1.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------