↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET880+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(l36_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(A),B) = empty_set
    <=> in(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l36_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t21_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = empty_set
     => A = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t21_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t21_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = empty_set
       => A = B ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t21_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( C = A
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( in(A,B)
    | set_difference(singleton(A),B) != empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l36_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( B != A
      & set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = empty_set ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t21_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( sK1 != sK0
    & set_difference(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)) = empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_6]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t21_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t21_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    in(sK0,singleton(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_18]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,singleton(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SET880+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:24:14 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.44  % Process 3833430 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.19/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 08:24:14 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.19/0.46  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.19/0.46  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.46  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.19/0.46  % Given clauses 12.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------