↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET881+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 5.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  12   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   4 sgn  12   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(l36_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(A),B) = empty_set
    <=> in(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l36_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t22_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] : set_difference(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t22_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t22_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : set_difference(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) = empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t22_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( D != B
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | set_difference(singleton(A),B) = empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l36_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [A,B] : set_difference(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)) != empty_set,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t22_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t22_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    set_difference(singleton(sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(singleton(sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t22_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( sK0 != B
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,sK0) != unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) != unordered_pair(A,sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET881+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.41  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/5.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:24:08 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.42  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/5.42  % Process 2638058 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.14/5.42  % Sat Sep 26 08:24:08 2026
% 0.14/5.42  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.42  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/5.43  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.14/5.43  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/5.43  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.14/5.43  % Given clauses 19.
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------