↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET882+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  28   ~;  26   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t23_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 != X2
     => set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l39_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ( in(X2,X3)
          | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( X1 != X2
       => set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t23_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ( in(X2,X3)
          | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l39_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 != esk5_0
    & set_difference(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk5_0)) != singleton(esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] : unordered_pair(X20,X21) = unordered_pair(X21,X20),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ( ~ in(X29,X31)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X29,X30),X31) != singleton(X29) )
      & ( in(X30,X31)
        | X29 = X30
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X29,X30),X31) != singleton(X29) )
      & ( ~ in(X30,X31)
        | in(X29,X31)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X29,X30),X31) = singleton(X29) )
      & ( X29 != X30
        | in(X29,X31)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X29,X30),X31) = singleton(X29) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( ~ in(X24,X23)
        | X24 = X22
        | X23 != singleton(X22) )
      & ( X25 != X22
        | in(X25,X23)
        | X23 != singleton(X22) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X26,X27),X27)
        | esk1_2(X26,X27) != X26
        | X27 = singleton(X26) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X26,X27),X27)
        | esk1_2(X26,X27) = X26
        | X27 = singleton(X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk5_0)) != singleton(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(X3,X1),X2) = singleton(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)) != singleton(esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X2)
    | in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != esk5_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET882+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:38:59 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------