↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET882+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  21   ~;  10   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  10   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(l39_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = singleton(A)
    <=> ( ( A = B
          | in(B,C) )
        & ~ in(A,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t23_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( A != B
     => set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(B)) = singleton(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t23_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t23_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( A != B
       => set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(B)) = singleton(A) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t23_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( C = A
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( C != A
    | in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,C)
    | in(A,C)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = singleton(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l39_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(B)) != singleton(A)
      & B != A ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t23_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK1,sK0),singleton(sK0)) != singleton(sK1)
    & sK0 != sK1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t23_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(sK1,sK0),singleton(sK0)) != singleton(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t23_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( A != B
    | in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_11]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_10]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_20]) ).

cnf(c_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK1,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    in(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK0,singleton(sK0))
    | in(sK1,singleton(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_52]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET882+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:25:54 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.45  % Process 2435645 was started by sandbox2 on n003,
% 0.19/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:25:54 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.19/0.47  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.19/0.47  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.19/0.47  % Given clauses 18.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------