↑ Up

Bliksem---1.12.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SET883+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 22:53:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET883+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 19:47:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.44/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.44/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.44/1.10  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Clauses:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  { subset( X, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  { empty( skol1 ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  { ! empty( skol2 ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  { subset( singleton( skol3 ), singleton( skol4 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 0.44/1.10  { ! subset( singleton( X ), singleton( Y ) ), X = Y }.
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  percentage equality = 0.285714, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.44/1.10  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Options Used:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  useres =            1
% 0.44/1.10  useparamod =        1
% 0.44/1.10  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.44/1.10  useeqfact =         1
% 0.44/1.10  usefactor =         1
% 0.44/1.10  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.44/1.10  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.44/1.10  usesimpres =        3
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.44/1.10  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.44/1.10  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.44/1.10  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.44/1.10  selectoldest =      5
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.44/1.10  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  termordering =      kbo
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  litapriori =        0
% 0.44/1.10  termapriori =       1
% 0.44/1.10  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.44/1.10  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.44/1.10  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.44/1.10  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  litselect =         negord
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  maxweight =         15
% 0.44/1.10  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.44/1.10  maxlength =         115
% 0.44/1.10  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.44/1.10  excuselevel =       1
% 0.44/1.10  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.44/1.10  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  showgenerated =    0
% 0.44/1.10  showkept =         0
% 0.44/1.10  showselected =     0
% 0.44/1.10  showdeleted =      0
% 0.44/1.10  showresimp =       1
% 0.44/1.10  showstatus =       2000
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  prologoutput =     0
% 0.44/1.10  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.44/1.10  totalproof =       1
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  subset  [37, 2]      (w:1, o:43, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  empty  [38, 1]      (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  singleton  [39, 1]      (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.10  skol1  [40, 0]      (w:1, o:8, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.10  skol2  [41, 0]      (w:1, o:9, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.10  skol3  [42, 0]      (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.10  skol4  [43, 0]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:1).
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Starting Search:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.44/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  (0) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} I { subset( X, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (3) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} I { subset( singleton( skol3 ), singleton( skol4 )
% 0.44/1.10     ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (4) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! skol4 ==> skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.10  (5) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2} I { ! subset( singleton( X ), singleton( Y ) ), X =
% 0.44/1.10     Y }.
% 0.44/1.10  (6) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(5,3) { skol4 ==> skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.10  (18) {G2,W8,D3,L2,V1,M2} P(5,4);d(6) { ! X = skol3, ! subset( singleton( X
% 0.44/1.10     ), singleton( skol3 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (23) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} Q(18);r(0) {  }.
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/1.10  found a proof!
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  (25) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { subset( X, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (26) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { empty( skol1 ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (27) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! empty( skol2 ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (28) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { subset( singleton( skol3 ), singleton( skol4 )
% 0.44/1.10     ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  (29) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 0.44/1.10  (30) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2}  { ! subset( singleton( X ), singleton( Y ) ), X =
% 0.44/1.10     Y }.
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  Total Proof:
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  subsumption: (0) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} I { subset( X, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  parent0: (25) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { subset( X, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.44/1.10     X := X
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.44/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  subsumption: (3) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} I { subset( singleton( skol3 ), 
% 0.44/1.10    singleton( skol4 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  parent0: (28) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { subset( singleton( skol3 ), singleton
% 0.44/1.10    ( skol4 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.44/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  eqswap: (31) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol4 = skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.10  parent0[0]: (29) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 0.44/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  subsumption: (4) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! skol4 ==> skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.10  parent0: (31) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol4 = skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.44/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  subsumption: (5) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2} I { ! subset( singleton( X ), 
% 0.44/1.10    singleton( Y ) ), X = Y }.
% 0.44/1.10  parent0: (30) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2}  { ! subset( singleton( X ), singleton( Y
% 0.44/1.10     ) ), X = Y }.
% 0.44/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.44/1.10     X := X
% 0.44/1.10     Y := Y
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.44/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.44/1.10     1 ==> 1
% 0.44/1.10  end
% 0.44/1.10  
% 0.44/1.10  eqswap: (Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------