↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET885+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 5.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  19   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   4 sgn  16   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t26_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(C))
     => A = C ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t26_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t26_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(C))
       => A = C ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( in(C,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( C != A
      & subset(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(C)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t26_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK0
    & subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),singleton(sK2)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_14,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),singleton(sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(A,singleton(sK2))
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 != sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ( C = A
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_313,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

cnf(c_314,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK2,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_18]) ).

cnf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,singleton(sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_313,c_314]) ).

cnf(c_175,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_315,plain,
    ( sK0 != A
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_175]) ).

cnf(c_316,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK0,A) != unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_315]) ).

cnf(c_317,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) != unordered_pair(sK0,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_316]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_317]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET885+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:24:05 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/5.38  % Process 809954 was started by sandbox on n006,
% 0.08/5.38  % Sat Sep 26 08:24:05 2026
% 0.08/5.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/5.38  
% 0.08/5.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.41  
% 0.14/5.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.41  
% 0.14/5.41  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/5.41  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.14/5.41  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/5.41  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.14/5.41  % Given clauses 44.
% 0.14/5.41  
% 0.14/5.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------