%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SET885+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rlmsmBmjHd true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:53:05 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 12 ~; 11 |; 0 &; 63 @)
% ( 5 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 ^; 35 !; 0 ?; 35 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__7_type,type,
sk__7: $i ).
thf(sk__5_type,type,
sk__5: $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__6_type,type,
sk__6: $i ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(d2_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ C )
<=> ( ( D = A )
| ( D = B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 != X0 )
| ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
| ( X2
!= ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d2_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl88,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X0
!= ( unordered_pair @ X2 @ X1 ) )
| ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl100,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ ( unordered_pair @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl88]) ).
thf(t26_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ C ) )
=> ( A = C ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ C ) )
=> ( A = C ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t26_zfmisc_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl18,plain,
subset @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) @ ( singleton @ sk__7 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl74,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( in @ X0 @ ( singleton @ sk__7 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl18,zip_derived_cl12]) ).
thf(d1_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B
= ( singleton @ A ) )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ B )
<=> ( C = A ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( X0 = X2 )
| ( X1
!= ( singleton @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d1_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl76,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( X0 = X1 )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( singleton @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl82,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) )
| ( X0 = sk__7 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl74,zip_derived_cl76]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl133,plain,
sk__5 = sk__7,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl100,zip_derived_cl82]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
sk__5 != sk__7,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl136,plain,
$false,
inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl133,zip_derived_cl19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET885+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rlmsmBmjHd true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 12:58:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.76 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.76 % BCE start: 20
% 0.57/0.76 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.76 % PE start: 20
% 0.57/0.76 logic: eq
% 0.57/0.76 % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.57/0.76 % done 48 iterations in 0.021s
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % Terminating...
% 1.74/0.88 % Runner terminated.
% 1.74/0.90 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------