↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SET889+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:22:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 54.87s 33.69s
% Output   : Proof 61.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET889+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 04:21:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.65/0.66          ____       _                          
% 0.65/0.66    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.65/0.66   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.65/0.66  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.65/0.66  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.65/0.66  
% 0.65/0.66  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.65/0.66  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.65/0.66  
% 0.65/0.66  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.65/0.66  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.65/0.66  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.65/0.66  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.65/0.66  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.65/0.66  
% 0.65/0.66  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.65/0.66  
% 0.65/0.66  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.74/0.71  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.50/0.96  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.83/1.13  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.99/1.15  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.70/1.36  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.70/1.36  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.70/1.38  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.02/1.46  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.02/1.46  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.15/1.53  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.15/1.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.36/1.55  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.45/1.61  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.45/1.61  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.99/1.68  Prover 2: gave up
% 3.99/1.68  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.99/1.70  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.99/1.72  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.99/1.72  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.45/1.78  Prover 3: gave up
% 4.45/1.78  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 4.45/1.79  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.75/1.85  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.75/1.85  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.38/2.04  Prover 4: gave up
% 5.38/2.04  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 5.38/2.05  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.85/2.08  Prover 5: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.85/2.08  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.04/2.13  Prover 5: gave up
% 6.04/2.13  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 6.04/2.13  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 6.23/2.16  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.23/2.17  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.23/2.21  Prover 6: gave up
% 6.23/2.21  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 6.23/2.22  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.23/2.24  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 28.37/12.94  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 28.37/12.96  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 28.77/13.00  Prover 8: Proving ...
% 50.80/31.45  Prover 9: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=completeFrugal
% 50.80/31.46  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 50.87/31.50  Prover 9: Proving ...
% 54.87/33.69  Prover 9: proved (2236ms)
% 54.87/33.69  Prover 7: stopped
% 54.87/33.69  Prover 8: stopped
% 54.87/33.69  
% 54.87/33.69  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 54.87/33.69  
% 54.87/33.69  Generating proof ... found it (size 80)
% 61.62/37.47  
% 61.62/37.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 61.62/37.47  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 61.62/37.47  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v4 = v3) & singleton(v1) = v2 & powerset(v2) = v3 & unordered_pair(v0, v2) = v4 & empty(v6) & empty(v0) &  ~ empty(v5) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = v8 | v10 = v7 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9) |  ~ in(v10, v9)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v9) = v8) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = v7 | v7 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v8) = v9) |  ~ subset(v7, v9)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (singleton(v9) = v8) |  ~ (singleton(v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (powerset(v9) = v8) |  ~ (powerset(v9) = v7)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9) | in(v8, v9)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9) | in(v7, v9)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9) |  ! [v10] : (v10 = v9 |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = v8 | v11 = v7 | in(v11, v10)) & ( ~ in(v11, v10) | ( ~ (v11 = v8) &  ~ (v11 = v7)))))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v7 |  ? [v9] : (( ~ in(v9, v8) |  ~ in(v9, v7)) & (in(v9, v8) | in(v9, v7)))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ subset(v8, v7) |  ! [v9] : (in(v8, v9) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = v9) & powerset(v7) = v10))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ in(v8, v7) |  ~ in(v7, v8)) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ in(v8, v7) |  ! [v9] : (subset(v8, v9) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = v7) & powerset(v9) = v10))) &  ! [v7] : subset(v7, v7) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = v8 & powerset(v7) = v8) | (( ~ subset(v9, v7) |  ~ in(v9, v8)) & (subset(v9, v7) | in(v9, v8)))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ? [v9] : (singleton(v8) = v9 & (subset(v7, v9) | ( ~ (v9 = v7) &  ~ (v7 = v0)))) &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ? [v9] : (unordered_pair(v8, v7) = v9 & unordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9))
% 61.73/37.50  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 yields:
% 61.73/37.50  | (1)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = all_0_3_3) & singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4 & powerset(all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3 & unordered_pair(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2 & empty(all_0_0_0) & empty(all_0_6_6) &  ~ empty(all_0_1_1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ in(v3, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v0 | v0 = all_0_6_6 |  ~ (singleton(v1) = v2) |  ~ subset(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | in(v1, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | in(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = v1 | v4 = v0 | in(v4, v3)) & ( ~ in(v4, v3) | ( ~ (v4 = v1) &  ~ (v4 = v0)))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ? [v2] : (( ~ in(v2, v1) |  ~ in(v2, v0)) & (in(v2, v1) | in(v2, v0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subset(v1, v0) |  ! [v2] : (in(v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & powerset(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) |  ~ in(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) |  ! [v2] : (subset(v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v0) & powerset(v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : subset(v0, v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : ((v2 = v1 & powerset(v0) = v1) | (( ~ subset(v2, v0) |  ~ in(v2, v1)) & (subset(v2, v0) | in(v2, v1)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : (singleton(v1) = v2 & (subset(v0, v2) | ( ~ (v2 = v0) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_6_6)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : (unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2)
% 61.73/37.50  |
% 61.73/37.50  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 61.73/37.50  | (2) empty(all_0_0_0)
% 61.73/37.50  | (3)  ~ empty(all_0_1_1)
% 61.73/37.50  | (4)  ! [v0] : subset(v0, v0)
% 61.73/37.50  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ? [v2] : (( ~ in(v2, v1) |  ~ in(v2, v0)) & (in(v2, v1) | in(v2, v0))))
% 61.73/37.50  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 61.73/37.50  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = v1 | v4 = v0 | in(v4, v3)) & ( ~ in(v4, v3) | ( ~ (v4 = v1) &  ~ (v4 = v0))))))
% 61.73/37.50  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : (unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2)
% 61.73/37.51  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) |  ! [v2] : (subset(v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v0) & powerset(v2) = v3)))
% 61.73/37.51  | (10) powerset(all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3
% 61.73/37.51  | (11) empty(all_0_6_6)
% 61.73/37.51  | (12)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = all_0_3_3)
% 61.73/37.51  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) |  ~ in(v0, v1))
% 61.73/37.51  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0))
% 61.73/37.51  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : ((v2 = v1 & powerset(v0) = v1) | (( ~ subset(v2, v0) |  ~ in(v2, v1)) & (subset(v2, v0) | in(v2, v1))))
% 61.73/37.51  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v0 | v0 = all_0_6_6 |  ~ (singleton(v1) = v2) |  ~ subset(v0, v2))
% 61.73/37.51  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ? [v2] : (singleton(v1) = v2 & (subset(v0, v2) | ( ~ (v2 = v0) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_6_6))))
% 61.73/37.51  | (18) singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.51  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subset(v1, v0) |  ! [v2] : (in(v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & powerset(v0) = v3)))
% 61.73/37.51  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | in(v1, v2))
% 61.73/37.51  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ in(v3, v2))
% 61.73/37.51  | (22) unordered_pair(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 61.73/37.51  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0))
% 61.73/37.51  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | in(v0, v2))
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Instantiating formula (20) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 61.73/37.51  | (25) in(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2)
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Instantiating formula (24) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 61.73/37.51  | (26) in(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2)
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Introducing new symbol ex_15_1_8 defined by:
% 61.73/37.51  | (27) ex_15_1_8 = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Introducing new symbol ex_15_0_7 defined by:
% 61.73/37.51  | (28) ex_15_0_7 = all_0_2_2
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Instantiating formula (15) with ex_15_0_7, ex_15_1_8 yields:
% 61.73/37.51  | (29)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = ex_15_0_7 & powerset(ex_15_1_8) = ex_15_0_7) | (( ~ subset(v0, ex_15_1_8) |  ~ in(v0, ex_15_0_7)) & (subset(v0, ex_15_1_8) | in(v0, ex_15_0_7))))
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  | Instantiating (29) with all_16_0_9 yields:
% 61.73/37.51  | (30) (all_16_0_9 = ex_15_0_7 & powerset(ex_15_1_8) = ex_15_0_7) | (( ~ subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) |  ~ in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)) & (subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) | in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)))
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (30), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.51  |-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.51  | (31) all_16_0_9 = ex_15_0_7 & powerset(ex_15_1_8) = ex_15_0_7
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  	| Applying alpha-rule on (31) yields:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (32) all_16_0_9 = ex_15_0_7
% 61.73/37.51  	| (33) powerset(ex_15_1_8) = ex_15_0_7
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  	| From (27)(28) and (33) follows:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (34) powerset(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  	| Instantiating formula (14) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms powerset(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, powerset(all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (35) all_0_2_2 = all_0_3_3
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  	| Equations (35) can reduce 12 to:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (36) $false
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.73/37.51  |-Branch two:
% 61.73/37.51  | (37) ( ~ subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) |  ~ in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)) & (subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) | in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7))
% 61.73/37.51  |
% 61.73/37.51  	| Applying alpha-rule on (37) yields:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (38)  ~ subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) |  ~ in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.73/37.51  	| (39) subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8) | in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (39), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.51  	|-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.51  	| (40) in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.73/37.51  	|
% 61.73/37.51  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (38), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.51  		|-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.51  		| (41)  ~ in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.73/37.51  		|
% 61.73/37.51  			| Using (40) and (41) yields:
% 61.73/37.51  			| (42) $false
% 61.73/37.51  			|
% 61.73/37.51  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.73/37.51  		|-Branch two:
% 61.73/37.51  		| (43)  ~ subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8)
% 61.73/37.51  		|
% 61.73/37.51  			| Instantiating formula (21) with all_16_0_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 61.73/37.52  			| (44) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4 | all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6 |  ~ in(all_16_0_9, all_0_2_2)
% 61.73/37.52  			|
% 61.73/37.52  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (44), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.52  			|-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.52  			| (45)  ~ in(all_16_0_9, all_0_2_2)
% 61.73/37.52  			|
% 61.73/37.52  				| From (28) and (40) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  				| (46) in(all_16_0_9, all_0_2_2)
% 61.73/37.52  				|
% 61.73/37.52  				| Using (46) and (45) yields:
% 61.73/37.52  				| (42) $false
% 61.73/37.52  				|
% 61.73/37.52  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.73/37.52  			|-Branch two:
% 61.73/37.52  			| (48) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4 | all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6
% 61.73/37.52  			|
% 61.73/37.52  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (48), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.52  				|-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.52  				| (49) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.52  				|
% 61.73/37.52  					| From (49) and (43) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (50)  ~ subset(all_0_4_4, ex_15_1_8)
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					| Introducing new symbol ex_65_1_22 defined by:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (51) ex_65_1_22 = all_16_0_9
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					| Introducing new symbol ex_65_0_21 defined by:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (52) ex_65_0_21 = all_0_5_5
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					| Instantiating formula (17) with ex_65_0_21, ex_65_1_22 yields:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (53)  ? [v0] : (singleton(ex_65_0_21) = v0 & (subset(ex_65_1_22, v0) | ( ~ (v0 = ex_65_1_22) &  ~ (ex_65_1_22 = all_0_6_6))))
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					| Instantiating (53) with all_66_0_23 yields:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (54) singleton(ex_65_0_21) = all_66_0_23 & (subset(ex_65_1_22, all_66_0_23) | ( ~ (all_66_0_23 = ex_65_1_22) &  ~ (ex_65_1_22 = all_0_6_6)))
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					| Applying alpha-rule on (54) yields:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (55) singleton(ex_65_0_21) = all_66_0_23
% 61.73/37.52  					| (56) subset(ex_65_1_22, all_66_0_23) | ( ~ (all_66_0_23 = ex_65_1_22) &  ~ (ex_65_1_22 = all_0_6_6))
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (56), into two cases.
% 61.73/37.52  					|-Branch one:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (57) subset(ex_65_1_22, all_66_0_23)
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Combining equations (49,51) yields a new equation:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (58) ex_65_1_22 = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| From (52) and (55) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (59) singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_23
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| From (58) and (57) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (60) subset(all_0_4_4, all_66_0_23)
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| From (27) and (50) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (61)  ~ subset(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4)
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Instantiating formula (23) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_66_0_23 and discharging atoms singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_23, singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (62) all_66_0_23 = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| From (62) and (60) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (63) subset(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4)
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Using (63) and (61) yields:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (42) $false
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.73/37.52  					|-Branch two:
% 61.73/37.52  					| (65)  ~ (all_66_0_23 = ex_65_1_22) &  ~ (ex_65_1_22 = all_0_6_6)
% 61.73/37.52  					|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Applying alpha-rule on (65) yields:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (66)  ~ (all_66_0_23 = ex_65_1_22)
% 61.73/37.52  						| (67)  ~ (ex_65_1_22 = all_0_6_6)
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Combining equations (49,51) yields a new equation:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (58) ex_65_1_22 = all_0_4_4
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Equations (58) can reduce 66 to:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (69)  ~ (all_66_0_23 = all_0_4_4)
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| From (52) and (55) follows:
% 61.73/37.52  						| (59) singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_23
% 61.73/37.52  						|
% 61.73/37.52  						| Instantiating formula (23) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_66_0_23 and discharging atoms singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_23, singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (62) all_66_0_23 = all_0_4_4
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Equations (62) can reduce 69 to:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (36) $false
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.52  				|-Branch two:
% 61.92/37.52  				| (73) all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6
% 61.92/37.52  				|
% 61.92/37.52  					| From (73) and (43) follows:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (74)  ~ subset(all_0_6_6, ex_15_1_8)
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					| Introducing new symbol ex_65_1_25 defined by:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (75) ex_65_1_25 = all_16_0_9
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					| Introducing new symbol ex_65_0_24 defined by:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (76) ex_65_0_24 = all_0_5_5
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					| Instantiating formula (17) with ex_65_0_24, ex_65_1_25 yields:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (77)  ? [v0] : (singleton(ex_65_0_24) = v0 & (subset(ex_65_1_25, v0) | ( ~ (v0 = ex_65_1_25) &  ~ (ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6))))
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					| Instantiating (77) with all_66_0_26 yields:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (78) singleton(ex_65_0_24) = all_66_0_26 & (subset(ex_65_1_25, all_66_0_26) | ( ~ (all_66_0_26 = ex_65_1_25) &  ~ (ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6)))
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					| Applying alpha-rule on (78) yields:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (79) singleton(ex_65_0_24) = all_66_0_26
% 61.92/37.52  					| (80) subset(ex_65_1_25, all_66_0_26) | ( ~ (all_66_0_26 = ex_65_1_25) &  ~ (ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6))
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (80), into two cases.
% 61.92/37.52  					|-Branch one:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (81) subset(ex_65_1_25, all_66_0_26)
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Combining equations (73,75) yields a new equation:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (82) ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| From (76) and (79) follows:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (83) singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_26
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| From (82) and (81) follows:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (84) subset(all_0_6_6, all_66_0_26)
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| From (27) and (74) follows:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (85)  ~ subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4)
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Instantiating formula (23) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_66_0_26 and discharging atoms singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_66_0_26, singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (86) all_66_0_26 = all_0_4_4
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| From (86) and (84) follows:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (87) subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4)
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Using (87) and (85) yields:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (42) $false
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.52  					|-Branch two:
% 61.92/37.52  					| (89)  ~ (all_66_0_26 = ex_65_1_25) &  ~ (ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6)
% 61.92/37.52  					|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Applying alpha-rule on (89) yields:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (90)  ~ (all_66_0_26 = ex_65_1_25)
% 61.92/37.52  						| (91)  ~ (ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6)
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Combining equations (73,75) yields a new equation:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (82) ex_65_1_25 = all_0_6_6
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						| Equations (82) can reduce 91 to:
% 61.92/37.52  						| (36) $false
% 61.92/37.52  						|
% 61.92/37.52  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.52  	|-Branch two:
% 61.92/37.52  	| (41)  ~ in(all_16_0_9, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.92/37.52  	| (95) subset(all_16_0_9, ex_15_1_8)
% 61.92/37.53  	|
% 61.92/37.53  		| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_16_0_9 and discharging atoms singleton(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 61.92/37.53  		| (96) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4 | all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6 |  ~ subset(all_16_0_9, all_0_4_4)
% 61.92/37.53  		|
% 61.92/37.53  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (96), into two cases.
% 61.92/37.53  		|-Branch one:
% 61.92/37.53  		| (97)  ~ subset(all_16_0_9, all_0_4_4)
% 61.92/37.53  		|
% 61.92/37.53  			| From (27) and (95) follows:
% 61.92/37.53  			| (98) subset(all_16_0_9, all_0_4_4)
% 61.92/37.53  			|
% 61.92/37.53  			| Using (98) and (97) yields:
% 61.92/37.53  			| (42) $false
% 61.92/37.53  			|
% 61.92/37.53  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.53  		|-Branch two:
% 61.92/37.53  		| (48) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4 | all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6
% 61.92/37.53  		|
% 61.92/37.53  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (48), into two cases.
% 61.92/37.53  			|-Branch one:
% 61.92/37.53  			| (49) all_16_0_9 = all_0_4_4
% 61.92/37.53  			|
% 61.92/37.53  				| From (49) and (41) follows:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (102)  ~ in(all_0_4_4, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				| From (28) and (102) follows:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (103)  ~ in(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2)
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				| Using (25) and (103) yields:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (42) $false
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.53  			|-Branch two:
% 61.92/37.53  			| (73) all_16_0_9 = all_0_6_6
% 61.92/37.53  			|
% 61.92/37.53  				| From (73) and (41) follows:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (106)  ~ in(all_0_6_6, ex_15_0_7)
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				| From (28) and (106) follows:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (107)  ~ in(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2)
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				| Using (26) and (107) yields:
% 61.92/37.53  				| (42) $false
% 61.92/37.53  				|
% 61.92/37.53  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 61.92/37.53  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 61.92/37.53  
% 61.92/37.53  36857ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------