↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.30s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  112 (  37 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  127 (  50   ~;  56   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   81 (   0 sgn  34   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = union(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ? [X4] :
              ( in(X3,X4)
              & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(t31_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : union(singleton(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t31_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45,X47,X48,X49,X50,X52] :
      ( ( in(X45,esk3_3(X43,X44,X45))
        | ~ in(X45,X44)
        | X44 != union(X43) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X43,X44,X45),X43)
        | ~ in(X45,X44)
        | X44 != union(X43) )
      & ( ~ in(X47,X48)
        | ~ in(X48,X43)
        | in(X47,X44)
        | X44 != union(X43) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_2(X49,X50),X50)
        | ~ in(esk4_2(X49,X50),X52)
        | ~ in(X52,X49)
        | X50 = union(X49) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X49,X50),esk5_2(X49,X50))
        | in(esk4_2(X49,X50),X50)
        | X50 = union(X49) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X49,X50),X49)
        | in(esk4_2(X49,X50),X50)
        | X50 = union(X49) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35] :
      ( ( ~ in(X32,X31)
        | X32 = X30
        | X31 != singleton(X30) )
      & ( X33 != X30
        | in(X33,X31)
        | X31 != singleton(X30) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X34,X35),X35)
        | esk1_2(X34,X35) != X34
        | X35 = singleton(X34) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X34,X35),X35)
        | esk1_2(X34,X35) = X34
        | X35 = singleton(X34) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | X4 != union(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | X2 != union(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39,X40,X41] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X37,X38)
        | ~ in(X39,X37)
        | in(X39,X38) )
      & ( in(esk2_2(X40,X41),X40)
        | subset(X40,X41) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_2(X40,X41),X41)
        | subset(X40,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X1,union(X2))
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,esk3_3(X2,X3,X1))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X3 != union(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(esk3_3(X1,union(X1),X2),X1)
    | ~ in(X2,union(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(X1,union(singleton(X2)))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(X1,esk3_3(X2,union(X2),X1))
    | ~ in(X1,union(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( esk3_3(singleton(X1),union(singleton(X1)),X2) = X1
    | ~ in(X2,union(singleton(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ( subset(X28,X29)
        | X28 != X29 )
      & ( subset(X29,X28)
        | X28 != X29 )
      & ( ~ subset(X28,X29)
        | ~ subset(X29,X28)
        | X28 = X29 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(singleton(X2)))
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,union(singleton(X2))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,union(singleton(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : union(singleton(X1)) = X1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t31_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    subset(X1,union(singleton(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( subset(union(singleton(X1)),X2)
    | in(esk2_2(union(singleton(X1)),X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    union(singleton(esk8_0)) != esk8_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( union(singleton(X1)) = X1
    | ~ subset(union(singleton(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    subset(union(singleton(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    union(singleton(esk8_0)) != esk8_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    union(singleton(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : SET890+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:37:54 EDT 2026
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.30/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.30/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/1.74  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------