↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.12s 12.63s
% Output   : Refutation 4.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  159 (   6   ~;   0   |;  16   &; 108   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  23  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0   ^;  39   !;   9   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(union_decl,type,
    union: $i > $i ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B
        = ( A @ singleton ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        <=> ( C = A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) )
       => ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) ) )
      & ( ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ( B @ union @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ( B @ union @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(92,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( A = B )
       => ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ singleton @ union )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t31_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ singleton @ union )
        = A ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ singleton @ union )
        = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
         => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B
        = ( A @ union ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        <=> ? [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
              & ( D @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ? [D: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                  & ( D @ ( C @ in ) ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ? [D: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                  & ( D @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) )
       => ( B
          = ( A @ union ) ) )
      & ( ( B
          = ( A @ union ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ? [D: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                  & ( D @ ( C @ in ) ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ? [D: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
                  & ( D @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(141,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[29,89,85,92,17,12,50,87,58,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/10.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/10.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:24:29 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/10.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/10.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.20/11.16  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (185ms). 
% 1.20/11.18  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.72/11.57  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.72/11.58  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.89/11.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.04/11.71  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.04/11.73  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.04/11.74  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.04/11.74  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.12/12.62  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.12/12.62  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.12/12.62  % Time passed: 2087ms (effective reasoning time: 1440ms)
% 4.12/12.62  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.12/12.62  % Axioms used in derivation (9): d1_tarski, l50_zfmisc_1, d4_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, d10_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, d3_tarski, reflexivity_r1_tarski
% 4.12/12.62  % No. of inferences in proof: 22
% 4.12/12.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2087 ms resp. 1440 ms w/o parsing
% 4.12/12.67  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.12/12.67  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------