↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_21)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fc2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
     => ~ empty(set_union2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).

fof(fc3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
     => ~ empty(set_union2(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).

fof(l52_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l52_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t32_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t41_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t41_enumset1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : ~ empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(i_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
     => ~ empty(set_union2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(i_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
     => ~ empty(set_union2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(i_0_12,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( empty(X25)
      | ~ empty(set_union2(X25,X26)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_10])]) ).

fof(i_0_13,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] : union(unordered_pair(X30,X31)) = set_union2(X30,X31),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[l52_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(i_0_14,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( empty(X27)
      | ~ empty(set_union2(X28,X27)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_11])]) ).

fof(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t32_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(i_0_16,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] : unordered_pair(X36,X37) = set_union2(singleton(X36),singleton(X37)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t41_enumset1]) ).

fof(i_0_17,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] : set_union2(X23,X24) = set_union2(X24,X23),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(i_0_18,plain,
    ! [X29] : set_union2(X29,X29) = X29,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(i_0_19,plain,
    ? [X1] : ~ empty(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rc2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(i_0_20,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | ~ empty(set_union2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_12]) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | ~ empty(set_union2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]) ).

fof(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0))) != unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_15])])]) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_16]) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]) ).

fof(i_0_27,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] : unordered_pair(X21,X22) = unordered_pair(X22,X21),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

fof(i_0_28,plain,
    ~ empty(esk2_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[i_0_19])]) ).

fof(i_0_29,plain,
    empty(esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | ~ empty(union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_20,c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | ~ empty(union(unordered_pair(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_22,c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0))) != unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_23]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = union(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_24,c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = union(unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_25,c_0_21]),c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_26,c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_27]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ~ empty(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_28]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    empty(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_29]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_39,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_40,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_42,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X1) = union(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | unordered_pair(X1,X3) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | unordered_pair(X3,X1) = unordered_pair(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_39_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_40_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_42_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X1) = union(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | unordered_pair(X1,X3) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | unordered_pair(X3,X1) = unordered_pair(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_32,i_0_33,i_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:39:25 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.63  % Total time : 1.273s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------