↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:57:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  14   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  16   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l52_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : union(unordered_pair(A,B)) = set_union2(A,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l52_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t32_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(A),singleton(B))) = unordered_pair(A,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t41_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = set_union2(singleton(A),singleton(B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t41_enumset1) ).

fof(f_6_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : union(unordered_pair(A,B)) = set_union2(A,B),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l52_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_6_2,plain,
    ! [U_11,U_10] : union(unordered_pair(U_11,U_10)) = set_union2(U_11,U_10),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_6_1]) ).

cnf(f_6_3,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(U_11,U_10)) = set_union2(U_11,U_10),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_2]) ).

fof(f_9_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(A),singleton(B))) = unordered_pair(A,B),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[t32_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_9_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(A),singleton(B))) != unordered_pair(A,B),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_9_1]) ).

fof(f_9_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_15,U_14] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(U_15),singleton(U_14))) != unordered_pair(U_15,U_14),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_9_2]) ).

fof(f_9_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_14] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(U_14))) != unordered_pair(sK3,U_14),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_15,sK3)],[f_9_3]) ).

fof(f_9_5,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_14,sK4)],[f_9_4]) ).

fof(f_9_6,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_9_5]) ).

cnf(f_9_7,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_9_6]) ).

fof(f_10_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = set_union2(singleton(A),singleton(B)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t41_enumset1]) ).

fof(f_10_2,plain,
    ! [U_17,U_16] : unordered_pair(U_17,U_16) = set_union2(singleton(U_17),singleton(U_16)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_10_1]) ).

cnf(f_10_3,plain,
    unordered_pair(U_17,U_16) = set_union2(singleton(U_17),singleton(U_16)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_10_2]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_9_7]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4)) != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)
    | union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) != set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))
    | union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))) = set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_6_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) != set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4))
    | set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4)) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) = set_union2(singleton(sK3),singleton(sK4)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_10_3]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:07:27 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------