↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:18:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t41_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t41_enumset1) ).

fof(t32_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l52_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l52_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X17] : set_union2(X17,X17) = X17,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : unordered_pair(X9,X10) = set_union2(singleton(X9),singleton(X10)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t41_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t32_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(esk1_0),singleton(esk2_0))) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] : union(unordered_pair(X7,X8)) = set_union2(X7,X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[l52_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    union(unordered_pair(singleton(esk1_0),singleton(esk2_0))) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X1),singleton(X2)) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0)) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X2,X2)) = unordered_pair(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET891+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:43:18 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % new_bool_3 with pid 2675457 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.54  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.54  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2675463 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.54  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.54  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.24/0.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.24/0.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.24/0.54  % Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.24/0.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % ...subsumed                          : 29
% 0.24/0.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 20
% 0.24/0.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.24/0.54  % Generated clauses                    : 64
% 0.24/0.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.24/0.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Paramodulations                      : 64
% 0.24/0.54  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 23
% 0.24/0.54  % ...of those cached                   : 10
% 0.24/0.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.24/0.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.24/0.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.24/0.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.24/0.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.24/0.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.24/0.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1
% 0.24/0.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.24/0.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.24/0.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.24/0.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 15
% 0.24/0.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/0.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
% 0.24/0.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.24/0.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 872
% 0.24/0.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 46
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.54  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.54  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.24/0.54  
% 0.24/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.54  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.54  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------