↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET899+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.15  % Problem    : SET899+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:24:24 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.48/0.64  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.66  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.58/0.66  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.66  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.58/0.66  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.58/0.66  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.58/0.66  
% 0.58/0.66  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.58/0.66  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.58/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.66  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.66  % File     : SET899+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.58/0.66  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.58/0.66  % Problem  : subset(A,B) => ( in(C,A) | subset(A,difference(B,singleton(C))) )
% 0.58/0.66  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.58/0.67  % English  :
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.58/0.67  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.67  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.58/0.67  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t40_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.58/0.67  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.58/0.67  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   2   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
% 0.58/0.67  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.67  %            Number of variables   :   12 (  10   !;   2   ?)
% 0.58/0.67  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.58/0.67  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.58/0.67  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.67  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.58/0.67      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.58/0.67      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.67        ( in(A,B)
% 0.58/0.67       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.58/0.67      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.58/0.67      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  fof(t40_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.58/0.67      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.58/0.67        ( subset(A,B)
% 0.58/0.67       => ( in(C,A)
% 0.58/0.67          | subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ) ) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  fof(l3_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.67      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.58/0.67        ( subset(A,B)
% 0.58/0.67       => ( in(C,A)
% 0.58/0.67          | subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ) ) ).
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.67  % Proof found
% 0.58/0.67  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.67  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.58/0.67  %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.58/0.67  %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.58/0.67  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.58/0.67  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.58/0.67  %SharedTerms:12
% 0.58/0.67  %goalClause: 2 5 6
% 0.58/0.67  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.58/0.67  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.58/0.67  [2]P2(a2,a4)
% 0.58/0.67  [4]~P1(a3)
% 0.58/0.67  [5]~P3(a5,a2)
% 0.58/0.67  [6]~P2(a2,f7(a4,f6(a5)))
% 0.58/0.67  [3]P2(x31,x31)
% 0.58/0.67  [7]~P3(x72,x71)+~P3(x71,x72)
% 0.58/0.67  [8]~P2(x82,x83)+P3(x81,x82)+P2(x82,f7(x83,f6(x81)))
% 0.58/0.67  %EqnAxiom
% 0.58/0.67  
% 0.58/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.67  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.58/0.67     ($false),
% 0.58/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,8]),
% 0.58/0.67     ['proof']).
% 0.58/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.58/0.67  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------