↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET900+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.52s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SET900+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:38:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.49/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.52/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % File     : SET900+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.52/0.60  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.52/0.60  % Problem  : ~ ( A != singleton(B) & A != empty_set & ~ ( in(C,A) & C != B ) )
% 0.52/0.60  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.52/0.60  % English  :
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.52/0.60  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.60  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.52/0.60  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t41_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.52/0.60  % Rating   : 0.08 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.09 v7.0.0, 0.10 v6.4.0, 0.15 v6.3.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.52/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   13 (   6 equ)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of connectives :   19 (  12   ~;   0   |;   6   &)
% 0.52/0.60  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   8   !;   2   ?)
% 0.52/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.52/0.60  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.52/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60        ( in(A,B)
% 0.52/0.60       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(t41_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.52/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60        ~ ( A != singleton(B)
% 0.52/0.60          & A != empty_set
% 0.52/0.60          & ! [C] :
% 0.52/0.60              ~ ( in(C,A)
% 0.52/0.60                & C != B ) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(l45_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60        ~ ( A != singleton(B)
% 0.52/0.60          & A != empty_set
% 0.52/0.60          & ! [C] :
% 0.52/0.60              ~ ( in(C,A)
% 0.52/0.60                & C != B ) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60  %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.52/0.60  %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.60  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.52/0.60  %goalClause: 12 13 15
% 0.52/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.52/0.60  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.52/0.60  [11]P1(a2)
% 0.52/0.60  [12]~E(a3,a1)
% 0.52/0.60  [14]~P1(a4)
% 0.52/0.60  [13]~E(f6(a5),a3)
% 0.52/0.60  [15]~P2(x151,a3)+E(x151,a5)
% 0.52/0.60  [17]~P2(x172,x171)+~P2(x171,x172)
% 0.52/0.60  [16]~E(f7(x161,x162),x162)+E(x161,a1)+E(x161,f6(x162))
% 0.52/0.60  [18]P2(f7(x181,x182),x181)+E(x181,a1)+E(x181,f6(x182))
% 0.52/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.52/0.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.52/0.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.52/0.60  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42))
% 0.52/0.60  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f7(x51,x53),f7(x52,x53))
% 0.52/0.60  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x63,x61),f7(x63,x62))
% 0.52/0.60  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.52/0.60  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.52/0.60  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a3,f6(x221))+P2(f7(a3,x221),a3)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,18])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a5,x261)+~P2(x261,a3)),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,2])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a5,f7(a3,x281))+E(a3,f6(x281))),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,22])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a5,f7(a3,a5))),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,28,2])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     (E(a3,f6(a5))),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,33,2,16])).
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(42,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     ($false),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,35,2]),
% 0.52/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.60  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------