↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  58 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  41   ~;  42   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (  11 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t42_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    <=> ~ ( X1 != empty_set
          & X1 != singleton(X2)
          & X1 != singleton(X3)
          & X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t42_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l46_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    <=> ~ ( X1 != empty_set
          & X1 != singleton(X2)
          & X1 != singleton(X3)
          & X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
      <=> ~ ( X1 != empty_set
            & X1 != singleton(X2)
            & X1 != singleton(X3)
            & X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t42_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X24,X25,X26] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X24,unordered_pair(X25,X26))
        | X24 = empty_set
        | X24 = singleton(X25)
        | X24 = singleton(X26)
        | X24 = unordered_pair(X25,X26) )
      & ( X24 != empty_set
        | subset(X24,unordered_pair(X25,X26)) )
      & ( X24 != singleton(X25)
        | subset(X24,unordered_pair(X25,X26)) )
      & ( X24 != singleton(X26)
        | subset(X24,unordered_pair(X25,X26)) )
      & ( X24 != unordered_pair(X25,X26)
        | subset(X24,unordered_pair(X25,X26)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l46_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) )
    & ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk4_0)
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) )
    & ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk5_0)
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) )
    & ( esk3_0 != unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) )
    & ( subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0))
      | esk3_0 = empty_set
      | esk3_0 = singleton(esk4_0)
      | esk3_0 = singleton(esk5_0)
      | esk3_0 = unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X3,X2))
    | X1 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | X1 = singleton(X3)
    | X1 = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0))
    | esk3_0 = empty_set
    | esk3_0 = singleton(esk4_0)
    | esk3_0 = singleton(esk5_0)
    | esk3_0 = unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    subset(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | esk3_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk5_0)
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | esk3_0 = empty_set
    | subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(X1,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    subset(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | esk3_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk4_0)
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | esk3_0 = empty_set
    | subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X18] : subset(X18,X18),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk3_0
    | esk3_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(empty_set,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:42:23 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------