↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  68 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  52   ~;  41   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (  12 sgn  25   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t42_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    <=> ~ ( X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X2)
          & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t42_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l46_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    <=> ~ ( X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X2)
          & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
      <=> ~ ( X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
            & X1 != singleton(X3)
            & X1 != singleton(X2)
            & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t42_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    <=> ~ ( X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X3)
          & X1 != singleton(X2)
          & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l46_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
      <=> ~ ( X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
            & X1 != singleton(X3)
            & X1 != singleton(X2)
            & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( subset(X9,unordered_pair(X10,X11))
        | X9 != unordered_pair(X10,X11) )
      & ( subset(X9,unordered_pair(X10,X11))
        | X9 != singleton(X11) )
      & ( subset(X9,unordered_pair(X10,X11))
        | X9 != singleton(X10) )
      & ( subset(X9,unordered_pair(X10,X11))
        | X9 != empty_set )
      & ( X9 = unordered_pair(X10,X11)
        | X9 = singleton(X11)
        | X9 = singleton(X10)
        | X9 = empty_set
        | ~ subset(X9,unordered_pair(X10,X11)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 = unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | esk1_0 = singleton(esk3_0)
      | esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0)
      | esk1_0 = empty_set
      | subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)) )
    & ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | esk1_0 != unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | esk1_0 != singleton(esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | esk1_0 != singleton(esk2_0) )
    & ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | esk1_0 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 != singleton(X2)
    | subset(X1,unordered_pair(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | X1 = singleton(X3)
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 = unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | esk1_0 = singleton(esk3_0)
    | esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0)
    | esk1_0 = empty_set
    | subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] : unordered_pair(X7,X8) = unordered_pair(X8,X7),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    subset(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set = esk1_0
    | singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | singleton(esk3_0) = esk1_0
    | unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | esk1_0 != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(X1,esk3_0))
    | empty_set = esk1_0
    | singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    subset(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set = esk1_0
    | singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | esk1_0 != singleton(esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,X1))
    | empty_set = esk1_0
    | unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X12] : subset(X12,X12),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | esk1_0 != unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set = esk1_0
    | unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | esk1_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    subset(empty_set,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    subset(esk1_0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:44:10 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % new_bool_1 with pid 266017 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.43  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 266024 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.43  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.09/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.09/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.09/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 31
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.09/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.09/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.09/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.09/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 0.09/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.09/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 48
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35
% 0.09/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.09/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 44
% 0.09/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.09/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 17
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 10
% 0.09/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.09/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.09/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.09/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.09/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.09/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 69
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.09/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.09/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.09/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.09/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.09/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.09/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.09/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1231
% 0.09/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 181
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.43  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------