↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.18s 1.43s
% Output   : Refutation 1.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 13:49:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Sun Jul 10 13:49:07 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 27456.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 11
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 64
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.18/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.18/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.18/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.38     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.18/1.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.18/1.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   1.05 sec ----> 2007 [back_demod,35,demod,1987,unit_del,1670,22] {-} $F.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Length of proof is 19.  Level of proof is 10.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.18/1.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.18/1.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  2 [] {-} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|$c5!=empty_set.
% 1.18/1.43  3 [copy,2,flip.2] {+} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|empty_set!=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  4 [] {-} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|$c5!=singleton($c4).
% 1.18/1.43  5 [copy,4,flip.2] {+} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|singleton($c4)!=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  6 [] {-} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|$c5!=singleton($c3).
% 1.18/1.43  7 [copy,6,flip.2] {+} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|singleton($c3)!=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  8 [] {-} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|$c5!=unordered_pair($c4,$c3).
% 1.18/1.43  9 [copy,8,flip.2] {+} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|unordered_pair($c4,$c3)!=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  10 [] {+} -subset(A,unordered_pair(B,C))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)|A=singleton(C)|A=unordered_pair(B,C).
% 1.18/1.43  11 [] {+} subset(A,unordered_pair(B,C))|A!=empty_set.
% 1.18/1.43  12 [] {+} subset(A,unordered_pair(B,C))|A!=singleton(B).
% 1.18/1.43  13 [] {+} subset(A,unordered_pair(B,C))|A!=singleton(C).
% 1.18/1.43  14 [] {+} subset(A,unordered_pair(B,C))|A!=unordered_pair(B,C).
% 1.18/1.43  16 [] {+} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.18/1.43  20 [] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|$c5=empty_set|$c5=singleton($c4)|$c5=singleton($c3)|$c5=unordered_pair($c4,$c3).
% 1.18/1.43  21 [copy,20,flip.2,flip.3,flip.4,flip.5] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3))|empty_set=$c5|singleton($c4)=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5|unordered_pair($c4,$c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  22 [] {+} A=A.
% 1.18/1.43  23 [hyper,16,14] {+} subset(unordered_pair(A,B),unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.18/1.43  35 [para_from,16.1.1,7.1.2] {+} -subset($c5,unordered_pair($c3,$c4))|singleton($c3)!=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  57 [hyper,21,10,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} empty_set=$c5|singleton($c4)=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5|unordered_pair($c4,$c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  125 [para_from,57.4.1,23.1.1] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c3,$c4))|empty_set=$c5|singleton($c4)=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  201 [hyper,22,13] {+} subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.18/1.43  202 [hyper,22,12] {+} subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.18/1.43  203 [hyper,22,11] {+} subset(empty_set,unordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.18/1.43  1230 [para_from,125.3.1,201.1.1,factor_simp] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c3,$c4))|empty_set=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  1631 [para_from,1230.3.1,202.1.1,factor_simp] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c3,$c4))|empty_set=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  1670 [para_from,1631.2.1,203.1.1,factor_simp] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c3,$c4)).
% 1.18/1.43  1696 [para_into,1670.1.2,16.1.1] {-} subset($c5,unordered_pair($c4,$c3)).
% 1.18/1.43  1704 [hyper,1696,9,57] {-} empty_set=$c5|singleton($c4)=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  1984 [hyper,1704,5,1696] {-} empty_set=$c5|singleton($c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  1987,1986 [hyper,1984,3,1696] {-} singleton($c3)=$c5.
% 1.18/1.43  2007 [back_demod,35,demod,1987,unit_del,1670,22] {-} $F.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.18/1.43  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  ============ end of search ============
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  true clauses given          11      (33.3%)
% 1.18/1.43  false clauses given         22
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.18/1.43     7  1         0
% 1.18/1.43     8  1         1
% 1.18/1.43     9  0         2
% 1.18/1.43    10  0         3
% 1.18/1.43    16  8         6
% 1.18/1.43    19  10        6
% 1.18/1.43    20  0         3
% 1.18/1.43    21  0         1
% 1.18/1.43    22  0         4
% 1.18/1.43    23  20        23
% 1.18/1.43    24  0         19
% 1.18/1.43    25  0         27
% 1.18/1.43    26  0         14
% 1.18/1.43    27  0         40
% 1.18/1.43    28  0         19
% 1.18/1.43    29  12        32
% 1.18/1.43    30  0         28
% 1.18/1.43    31  0         45
% 1.18/1.43    32  0         21
% 1.18/1.43    33  8         38
% 1.18/1.43    34  0         17
% 1.18/1.43    35  0         12
% 1.18/1.43    36  0         20
% 1.18/1.43    37  0         2
% 1.18/1.43    38  0         65
% 1.18/1.43    39  0         9
% 1.18/1.43    41  0         10
% 1.18/1.43    42  0         19
% 1.18/1.43    43  0         66
% 1.18/1.43    44  0         130
% 1.18/1.43    45  0         8
% 1.18/1.43    46  0         4
% 1.18/1.43    47  0         4
% 1.18/1.43    48  0         5
% 1.18/1.43    49  0         110
% 1.18/1.43    50  0         46
% 1.18/1.43    51  0         2
% 1.18/1.43    52  0         4
% 1.18/1.43    55  0         39
% 1.18/1.43    57  0         1
% 1.18/1.43  tot:  60        905      (93.8% true)
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.18/1.43  
% 1.18/1.43  Process 27456 finished Sun Jul 10 13:49:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------