↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:49:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.64s 6.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   64 (  23 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  242 ( 131 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  207 (  81   ~;  92   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   1 sgn  55   !;   9   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(f6,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ~ ( X0 != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
          & X0 != singleton(X2)
          & X0 != singleton(X1)
          & X0 != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t42_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
      <=> ~ ( X0 != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
            & X0 != singleton(X2)
            & X0 != singleton(X1)
            & X0 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ~ ( X0 != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
          & X0 != singleton(X2)
          & X0 != singleton(X1)
          & X0 != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <~> ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 )
      & ( ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) != X0
          & singleton(X2) != X0
          & singleton(X1) != X0
          & empty_set != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 )
      & ( ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) != X0
          & singleton(X2) != X0
          & singleton(X1) != X0
          & empty_set != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ( subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
      | sK2 = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)
      | sK2 = singleton(sK4)
      | sK2 = singleton(sK3)
      | empty_set = sK2 )
    & ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
      | ( sK2 != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)
        & sK2 != singleton(sK4)
        & sK2 != singleton(sK3)
        & empty_set != sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3),skolemize(X2,sK4)],[f15]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 )
      & ( ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) != X0
          & singleton(X2) != X0
          & singleton(X1) != X0
          & empty_set != X0 )
        | subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
        | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
        | singleton(X2) = X0
        | singleton(X1) = X0
        | empty_set = X0 )
      & ( ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) != X0
          & singleton(X2) != X0
          & singleton(X1) != X0
          & empty_set != X0 )
        | subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | sK2 = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)
    | sK2 = singleton(sK4)
    | sK2 = singleton(sK3)
    | empty_set = sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | sK2 != unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | sK2 != singleton(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | sK2 != singleton(sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | empty_set != sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
      | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0
      | singleton(X2) = X0
      | singleton(X1) = X0
      | empty_set = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X2) != X0
      | subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X1) != X0
      | subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != X0
      | subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] : subset(empty_set,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] : subset(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] : subset(singleton(X2),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( empty_set != sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( singleton(sK3) != sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( singleton(sK4) != sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) != sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( empty_set = sK2 )
    | ( singleton(sK4) = sK2 )
    | ( singleton(sK3) = sK2 )
    | ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) = sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(empty_set,unordered_pair(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = empty_set )
      | ( singleton(X2) = X0 )
      | ( singleton(X1) = X0 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) = X0 )
      | ~ subset(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_177,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 != sK2 )
      | ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) != sK2 )
      | ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) != X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_178,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) != sK2,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_177]) ).

tcf(c_337,plain,
    ( subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
    | ( empty_set = sK2 )
    | ( singleton(sK4) = sK2 )
    | ( singleton(sK3) = sK2 ) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_178]) ).

tcf(c_786,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = singleton(sK3),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_787,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = singleton(sK4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_788,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_789,plain,
    ( subset(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ( iPr_def_11 = sK2 )
    | ( iPr_def_10 = sK2 )
    | ( empty_set = sK2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_788,c_787,c_786]) ).

tcf(c_790,plain,
    iPr_def_12 != sK2,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_178]) ).

tcf(c_791,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ( iPr_def_11 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_792,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ( iPr_def_10 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

tcf(c_793,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ( empty_set != sK2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_996,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subset(iPr_def_10,unordered_pair(sK3,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_786,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_1001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subset(iPr_def_11,unordered_pair(X0,sK4)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_787,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1005,plain,
    subset(empty_set,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_788,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_1007,plain,
    subset(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_788,c_996]) ).

tcf(c_1008,plain,
    subset(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_788,c_1001]) ).

tcf(c_1045,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = empty_set )
      | ( singleton(sK4) = X0 )
      | ( singleton(sK3) = X0 )
      | ( unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) = X0 )
      | ~ subset(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_788,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_1062,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = iPr_def_12 )
      | ( X0 = iPr_def_11 )
      | ( X0 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ( X0 = empty_set )
      | ~ subset(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1045,c_786,c_787,c_788]) ).

tcf(c_1089,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ( empty_set = sK2 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_789,c_1062]) ).

tcf(c_1133,plain,
    ( subset(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_1005]) ).

tcf(c_1136,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ subset(sK2,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_793]) ).

tcf(c_1149,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1133,c_1136]) ).

tcf(c_1163,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1149,c_790]) ).

tcf(c_1175,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ subset(sK2,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1163,c_791]) ).

tcf(c_1185,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ subset(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1163,c_1175]) ).

tcf(c_1186,plain,
    sK2 = iPr_def_10,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1185,c_1008]) ).

tcf(c_1190,plain,
    ( ~ subset(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12)
    | ( iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_792,c_1186]) ).

tcf(c_1193,plain,
    ~ subset(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_1190]) ).

tcf(c_1194,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1193,c_1007]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET901+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.19/5.46  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.19/5.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/5.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/5.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/5.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/5.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/5.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/5.46  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:20:51 UTC 2026
% 0.19/5.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/5.46  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.23/5.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/5.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/5.54  
% 0.23/5.54  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.23/5.54  
% 0.23/5.54  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.23/5.56  % Proving...
% 2.64/6.54  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.64/6.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.64/6.54  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.64/6.54  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Proving...
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % 
% 2.64/6.54  % clauses                               17
% 2.64/6.54  % conjectures                           3
% 2.64/6.54  % EPR                                   9
% 2.64/6.54  % Horn                                  15
% 2.64/6.54  % unary                                 12
% 2.64/6.54  % binary                                3
% 2.64/6.54  % lits                                  27
% 2.64/6.54  % lits eq                               15
% 2.64/6.54  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.64/6.54  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.64/6.54  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.64/6.54  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 2.64/6.54  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ 
% 2.64/6.54  % Current options:
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % ------ Proving...
% 2.64/6.54  % 
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.64/6.54  
% 2.64/6.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------